2017 - NRL - Rugby League TV Ratings

[Terry]

By my quick calculations RL got over 300k more ratings on STV last round than the fumblers. That's the ratings of 15 teams v 18. I'll re check the numbers when I get a chance.

[AFLcrap1]

But but but but
isolation,
But but but but but but
Lol lol lol

[leeroy*NRL*]

who is leading the FOX figures for the year

AFL V NRL>>

I wanna see how much fox overpaid again lol

[Terry]

I'm not sure of year to date figures. I've only been taking more notice the last few weeks since Wookie hasn't posted his numbers.

[leagueiscrap]

who is leading the FOX figures for the year

AFL V NRL>>

I wanna see how much fox overpaid again lol

For the nrlol

You think people that run those billion dollar companies that sign billion dollar contracts just sign the contracts and not do any research in what they are signing!

Bahahahaha you have NFI! There is a reason why they paid more for the AFL with far less control of the content

[leagueiscrap]

But but but but
isolation,
But but but but but but
Lol lol lol

Exactly ignore fixtures and reality!
And just be selective like usual

There is a reason why the AFL got more in its broadcast deal for full control! While the nrlol threw every thing out including the kitchen sink just to be close to the AFL

[Terry]

https://twitter.com/MediaweekAUS

RL dominates social content ratings for the week. Took top spot and three of the top five.

[leeroy*NRL*]

who is leading the FOX figures for the year

AFL V NRL>>

I wanna see how much fox overpaid again lol

For the nrlol

You think people that run those billion dollar companies that sign billion dollar contracts just sign the contracts and not do any research in what they are signing!

Bahahahaha you have NFI! There is a reason why they paid more for the AFL with far less control of the content

you and your NFI NFI>>>>

IF Rugby League beats AFL in PAY TV again>>>

don't you think that FOX Paid more than it should of>>>

and you have NFI NFI

when you buy a house at Auction a lot of people pay overs because that want the house>>

it is like the Networks paying overs >> but than realizing later we paid too much>>

(Stop Blowing your bubble too early)

[Fred]

I think you have to consider what fox was buying. They want subscribers and as fox doesn't or didn't have the uptake in AFL states it was a good way to get some penetration there's. Also, having Australia's biggest sport in that of AFL allows greater reach whereas nrl you are confined to nsw and qld for the main.

[leagueiscrap]

who is leading the FOX figures for the year

AFL V NRL>>

I wanna see how much fox overpaid again lol

For the nrlol

You think people that run those billion dollar companies that sign billion dollar contracts just sign the contracts and not do any research in what they are signing!

Bahahahaha you have NFI! There is a reason why they paid more for the AFL with far less control of the content

you and your NFI NFI>>>>

IF Rugby League beats AFL in PAY TV again>>>

don't you think that FOX Paid more than it should of>>>

and you have NFI NFI

when you buy a house at Auction a lot of people pay overs because that want the house>>

it is like the Networks paying overs >> but than realizing later we paid too much>>

(Stop Blowing your bubble too early)

the only reason why the NRLOL beats AFL in fox is because of the showing games in isolation, AFL having games being played and shown at the same time & over lapping! & fox have more exclusive games and along with C9 they still control the NRLOL fixture! the AFL has full control of everything & still got more more money!

buying a house as to a broadcast contract are totally different thing, one is a 5 or 6 year contract as to at least 10 to 20 years for a house

paying overs for something is some imaginary thing that you dweebs along with ROy masters dribble on about because your NRLOL got less


to suggest that networks payed several 100 million in overs for the rights is laughable & delusional at best from you jealous & bitter NRLOL lot
given the fact for negotiation for both contracts c7, c9 & fox & every other party involved brought people who thought were specialists in to negotiate the contracts!

as well as given the size of the contracts! the dying revenues in the traditional FTA and pay TV with different services available the networks have even less money floating about to suggest networks with specialists handling the contracts to make a mistake in paying several hundred million over for a product

it sums up your a jealous delusional gimp with NFI about money

[AFLcrap1]

For the nrlol

You think people that run those billion dollar companies that sign billion dollar contracts just sign the contracts and not do any research in what they are signing!

Bahahahaha you have NFI! There is a reason why they paid more for the AFL with far less control of the content

you and your NFI NFI>>>>

IF Rugby League beats AFL in PAY TV again>>>

don't you think that FOX Paid more than it should of>>>

and you have NFI NFI

when you buy a house at Auction a lot of people pay overs because that want the house>>

it is like the Networks paying overs >> but than realizing later we paid too much>>

(Stop Blowing your bubble too early)

the only reason why the NRLOL beats AFL in fox is because of the showing games in isolation, AFL having games being played and shown at the same time & over lapping! & fox have more exclusive games and along with C9 they still control the NRLOL fixture! the AFL has full control of everything & still got more more money!

buying a house as to a broadcast contract are totally different thing, one is a 5 or 6 year contract as to at least 10 to 20 years for a house

paying overs for something is some imaginary thing that you dweebs along with ROy masters dribble on about because your NRLOL got less


to suggest that networks payed several 100 million in overs for the rights is laughable & delusional at best from you jealous & bitter NRLOL lot
given the fact for negotiation for both contracts c7, c9 & fox & every other party involved brought people who thought were specialists in to negotiate the contracts!

as well as given the size of the contracts! the dying revenues in the traditional FTA and pay TV with different services available the networks have even less money floating about to suggest networks with specialists handling the contracts to make a mistake in paying several hundred million over for a product

it sums up your a jealous delusional gimp with NFI about money

What a hypocrit
You were complaining about name calling recently
So what do you do
Call a Mod a gimp .

you're just not real bright are you

[leagueiscrap]

you and your NFI NFI>>>>

IF Rugby League beats AFL in PAY TV again>>>

don't you think that FOX Paid more than it should of>>>

and you have NFI NFI

when you buy a house at Auction a lot of people pay overs because that want the house>>

it is like the Networks paying overs >> but than realizing later we paid too much>>

(Stop Blowing your bubble too early)

the only reason why the NRLOL beats AFL in fox is because of the showing games in isolation, AFL having games being played and shown at the same time & over lapping! & fox have more exclusive games and along with C9 they still control the NRLOL fixture! the AFL has full control of everything & still got more more money!

buying a house as to a broadcast contract are totally different thing, one is a 5 or 6 year contract as to at least 10 to 20 years for a house

paying overs for something is some imaginary thing that you dweebs along with ROy masters dribble on about because your NRLOL got less


to suggest that networks payed several 100 million in overs for the rights is laughable & delusional at best from you jealous & bitter NRLOL lot
given the fact for negotiation for both contracts c7, c9 & fox & every other party involved brought people who thought were specialists in to negotiate the contracts!

as well as given the size of the contracts! the dying revenues in the traditional FTA and pay TV with different services available the networks have even less money floating about to suggest networks with specialists handling the contracts to make a mistake in paying several hundred million over for a product

it sums up your a jealous delusional gimp with NFI about money

What a hypocrit
You were complaining about name calling recently
So what do you do
Call a Mod a gimp .

you're just not real bright are you

Like usual no comment about anything to the discussion just troll!

Suck it
Nrl got less than the AFL even after trying to sell the kitchen sink! Mean while the AFL keeps full control

[leeroy*NRL*]

I think you have to consider what fox was buying. They want subscribers and as fox doesn't or didn't have the uptake in AFL states it was a good way to get some penetration there's. Also, having Australia's biggest sport in that of AFL allows greater reach whereas nrl you are confined to nsw and qld for the main.

yeah that is a true point (a strategic move) by FOX>>

by all means>> AFL in northen states on fox is pretty low too..

[leeroy*NRL*]

For the nrlol

You think people that run those billion dollar companies that sign billion dollar contracts just sign the contracts and not do any research in what they are signing!

Bahahahaha you have NFI! There is a reason why they paid more for the AFL with far less control of the content

you and your NFI NFI>>>>

IF Rugby League beats AFL in PAY TV again>>>

don't you think that FOX Paid more than it should of>>>

and you have NFI NFI

when you buy a house at Auction a lot of people pay overs because that want the house>>

it is like the Networks paying overs >> but than realizing later we paid too much>>

(Stop Blowing your bubble too early)

the only reason why the NRLOL beats AFL in fox is because of the showing games in isolation, AFL having games being played and shown at the same time & over lapping! & fox have more exclusive games and along with C9 they still control the NRLOL fixture! the AFL has full control of everything & still got more more money!

buying a house as to a broadcast contract are totally different thing, one is a 5 or 6 year contract as to at least 10 to 20 years for a house

paying overs for something is some imaginary thing that you dweebs along with ROy masters dribble on about because your NRLOL got less


to suggest that networks payed several 100 million in overs for the rights is laughable & delusional at best from you jealous & bitter NRLOL lot
given the fact for negotiation for both contracts c7, c9 & fox & every other party involved brought people who thought were specialists in to negotiate the contracts!

as well as given the size of the contracts! the dying revenues in the traditional FTA and pay TV with different services available the networks have even less money floating about to suggest networks with specialists handling the contracts to make a mistake in paying several hundred million over for a product

it sums up your a jealous delusional gimp with NFI about money

even if games are shown in Isolation>>
the number of subscribers watching at the end is all that counts..

or it could be a number of factors, like what FRED said.
all it could be there are more advertising sections within the product..
why FOX would outlay more and still get a better return..

and yes the networks control the game now>>
but that all changes in 2018 (which has been said many times)

I am not stating the networks paid overs by hundreds of millions of dollars..

I await wookie's spreadsheet of numbers

btw don't call me a Gimp again.

[pussycat]

Thu STV #NRL #FoxLeague #NRLEelsTitans National 192k: Metro 136k (Syd 84k Mel 10k Bri 35k Ade 3k Per 3k)


Thu TV #NRL #NRLEelsTitans Nine/GEM 712k Metro 439k (Syd 241k Bri 175k) Regional 273k


= 904k

Not to bad a start to the round.