AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2017 10:01 am
leagueiscrap wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2017 6:26 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Feb 05, 2017 7:43 pm
You are too fucking dumb to argue with .
Also being a compulsive liar makes any debate with you laughable .
Just to highlight that fact .
Show where I've ever mocked Melb City.
Lol
I've mocked the TV ratings ...
The pathetic crowd behaviour
The delusional predictions of the fans .....
For the 100th time .
You can't forget pokie money just because it doesn't suit your argument
Syd clubs have a long history of backing of leagues clubs .
You continuously try to ignore this..
Why
It's the way clubs are set up in SYD...AFL clubs in Melb have a different set up .
What the fuck is wrong with you ..I'm deadly serious ....you just can't grasp anything .
It's beyond you .
You tried to claim awhile ago some shit about the Broncos leagues club
Wookie had to set you straight that you had NFI what you we're talking about .you still don't
& stop spamming multiple threads with this shit .
Everyone's sick of it .
Lol
So a AFL or nrlols club football related revenue is completely irrelevant. the fact all the nsw teams are running as a financial loss & are having tantrums with the nrlol commission over extra funding?
Bahahahaha
You have NFI spazza
Go back that bucket of lemons
Talk about SELF OWNAGE .
Firstly please show where I said FOOTBALL related revenue is completely irrelevant?
You can't ..you made that up (lie lie lie)
In fact your whole fucking argument over multiple threads that you have spammed has tried to ignore non football related revenue .
I've posted over & over & you keep ignoring that all forms of revenue wether membership sponsorship ...leagues clubs ..wealthy private owners etc are all REVENUE ....depending on the club set up in each sport .
You just can't grasp that .
You are too stupid .
You say I'm ignoring a form of revenue ..when in fact I'm talking all revenue .
It is you who won't look at the big picture .
Get help
& stop spamming.
Your bolder statement above shows how far you are removed from reality . How you have no fucking comprehension of plain English .
Anyone can read the below & understand
Yet you read it & apparently it says the opposite of what other people read .
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 05, 2017 7:52 am
The point that has been made over & over & over & that you just can't grasp......even after it has been explained by many posters is REVENUE is not just about Football related revenue .
It's all revenue .
Why do you think AFL clubs are relying more & more on pokie money.....because it's a source of revenue.
Why are NRl clubs now chasing memberships after it never being important .....because it's revenue .
FFS how fucking dumb are you .
All money coming in is revenue ..doesn't matter if it's football related or not .
lol
you have nfi
all revenue is important, the bit i keep trying to argue and you deflect is that football revenue, you know the NRLOL clubs are pissant minnows yet you keep trying to deflect
football related revenue
sponsorship, companies want their product seen
gate returns, people, paying to see their team play
merchandise, people buying a clubs merchandise to wear the teams colors,
but but NRLOL has wealthy owners!
it doesn't change the fact spazza the NRLOL teams football related financial returns are minnow and pathetic! why
the teams are minnows!
wealthy owners, yet the clubs are throwing tantrums to get extra funding from the NRLOL commission
nothing you can attempt and argue can change that
