Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
St Kilda must be desperate. They talked up Wellington and then pulled out, or got kicked out maybe. Now they're talking it down but talking Auckland up. Not a good way to treat the NZ public I wouldn't think. It's a bit like what GWS did to Blacktown.
- leeroy*NRL*
- Moderator
- Posts: 7120
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:54 pm
- Team: St George Illawarra Dragons
- Location: Gold Coast
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
I predict a fail 2nd time running.
But there is always a 3rd time i guess
But there is always a 3rd time i guess
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Don't think so seems to be the way of professional sport - after all NRL have played games on off and not gone back - how's that any different or having the Storm be a Curtin raiser for the Broncos - that seems more desperate!Darren wrote:St Kilda must be desperate. They talked up Wellington and then pulled out, or got kicked out maybe. Now they're talking it down but talking Auckland up. Not a good way to treat the NZ public I wouldn't think. It's a bit like what GWS did to Blacktown.
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
AFLcrap1 wrote:I'll stay on topic .Fred wrote:How about we all stay on topic .
My question or observation if you will was that if there is little interest ... And I agree there is, isn't that more reason to try and promote it ?
I was just highlighting the forum fuckhead doing a great impersonation of a hypocrite .
Lol & he can't say what The raiders crowd has to do with fumblers in NZ.
Lol
As for trying ..
It's been tried in NZ
Crowds went backward at a rapid rate .
Yet somehow it might work .
Lol
I am not sure why you care do much but you must have your reasons i guess. Just because sonething was tried and did not work is not necessarily a reason not to do it again. Otherwise there would be no nrl team on the gold coast and no talj of expanding a nrl team to perth for instance.)
Veni, vidi, vici
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Ummm because they made a bit of extra $$$ while the Broncos service the Brisbane area every other week.Swans4ever wrote:Don't think so seems to be the way of professional sport - after all NRL have played games on off and not gone back - how's that any different or having the Storm be a Curtin raiser for the Broncos - that seems more desperate!Darren wrote:St Kilda must be desperate. They talked up Wellington and then pulled out, or got kicked out maybe. Now they're talking it down but talking Auckland up. Not a good way to treat the NZ public I wouldn't think. It's a bit like what GWS did to Blacktown.
Fair Dinkum.
Can you point me out to where the NZ AFL side is that competes every other week out of Auckland like you are trying not to suggest happens in Brisbane?
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Fred wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:I'll stay on topic .Fred wrote:How about we all stay on topic .
My question or observation if you will was that if there is little interest ... And I agree there is, isn't that more reason to try and promote it ?
I was just highlighting the forum fuckhead doing a great impersonation of a hypocrite .
Lol & he can't say what The raiders crowd has to do with fumblers in NZ.
Lol
As for trying ..
It's been tried in NZ
Crowds went backward at a rapid rate .
Yet somehow it might work .
Lol
I am not sure why you care do much but you must have your reasons i guess. Just because sonething was tried and did not work is not necessarily a reason not to do it again. Otherwise there would be no nrl team on the gold coast and no talj of expanding a nrl team to perth for instance.)
Because when the Gold Coast Chargers were wrapped up at the end of the 98 or 99 season, they had 3 million plus in the bank, had made their first ever finals appearance, made their first ever profit yet the then ARL/SL decided Newcastle needed that money and the Gold Coast needed removing from a renewed joined comp. The Perth lot is well documented, you don't need to lie about that one either.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Lol the fumblers love to talk about Rl but seem to have very little idea about the history or what happens in RL
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Fred wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:I'll stay on topic .Fred wrote:How about we all stay on topic .
My question or observation if you will was that if there is little interest ... And I agree there is, isn't that more reason to try and promote it ?
I was just highlighting the forum fuckhead doing a great impersonation of a hypocrite .
Lol & he can't say what The raiders crowd has to do with fumblers in NZ.
Lol
As for trying ..
It's been tried in NZ
Crowds went backward at a rapid rate .
Yet somehow it might work .
Lol
I am not sure why you care do much but you must have your reasons i guess. Just because sonething was tried and did not work is not necessarily a reason not to do it again. Otherwise there would be no nrl team on the gold coast and no talj of expanding a nrl team to perth for instance.)
Because when the Gold Coast Chargers were wrapped up at the end of the 98 or 99 season, they had 3 million plus in the bank, had made their first ever finals appearance, made their first ever profit yet the then ARL/SL decided Newcastle needed that money and the Gold Coast needed removing from a renewed joined comp. The Perth lot is well documented, you don't need to lie about that one either.
FFS the super league war will soon be the reason for global warming - let it go Para it happened RL has moved on and so should you.
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
The point is, what is wrong with trying to promote a game or code in an area wherr it has little interest. I just do not see why all the interest from people who profess to not caring for AFL. If it has little impact no harm is done but if it has some impact then there could be untold benefits. It is basicallt a business decision. What do people who are against this proposal think could be thr cons?
Veni, vidi, vici
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Nothing wrong with trying to promote it
What gets to other sports fans are the lies told about it .
30 k registered players was the biggie last time .
No media ever ever questioned the propaganda
Then it gets repeated till it becomes a fact in fumble land
What gets to other sports fans are the lies told about it .
30 k registered players was the biggie last time .
No media ever ever questioned the propaganda
Then it gets repeated till it becomes a fact in fumble land
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Okay. I guess mist people dont really care
Veni, vidi, vici
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Or like NRL is a national sport in Australia FFS you really are a hypocrite!AFLcrap1 wrote:Nothing wrong with trying to promote it
What gets to other sports fans are the lies told about it .
30 k registered players was the biggie last time .
No media ever ever questioned the propaganda
Then it gets repeated till it becomes a fact in fumble land
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Or the AFL being the same.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
- leagueiscrap
- Banned
- Posts: 7862
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
Lol just pointing out the facts spazza!AFLcrap1 wrote:Lol
Fucking hell
Dumbos rants about 2 seperate sports are top quality comedy material .
heres a hint dumbo . RU & RL have hated each other for a long long time .
There's very little cross over fans
League and union are both classed as rugby

Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Auckland's turn for Fumbles n Bumbles
I didn't suggest that - my point is in professional sport they do games in other cities for money - the Storm playing in Brisbane wasn't done to spread RL or build a following but rather for their bottom line. I didn't think I had to spell it out.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Ummm because they made a bit of extra $$$ while the Broncos service the Brisbane area every other week.Swans4ever wrote:Don't think so seems to be the way of professional sport - after all NRL have played games on off and not gone back - how's that any different or having the Storm be a Curtin raiser for the Broncos - that seems more desperate!Darren wrote:St Kilda must be desperate. They talked up Wellington and then pulled out, or got kicked out maybe. Now they're talking it down but talking Auckland up. Not a good way to treat the NZ public I wouldn't think. It's a bit like what GWS did to Blacktown.
Fair Dinkum.
Can you point me out to where the NZ AFL side is that competes every other week out of Auckland like you are trying not to suggest happens in Brisbane?
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS