AFLcrap1 wrote:Firstly sarge you said players ....you know plural ,.
I said I know of one .
Why can't you name the others .
You said it dickhead
How can you clear your name when you can't even tell anyone what you were injected with .
Lol
You know what's hysterical
The same bunch of drug cheats are trying to get off on a technicality
Not clear their name .
As they & the club have since this started ,looking for a way to weasel out .
Lol
Pathetic bunch ....not surprising you support them .
Whilst my gramma can be criticised - the fact remains that A player was trafficking horse steroids to other players who were using and thus the statement is not a lie. 2nd name a court of appeal (which is not a de novo hearing) that can rehear the evidence in the case - so it would appear they have a good ground to appeal. If they been denied natural justice then they have every right to appeal. That's what a court of law is stupid! If the appeal was fundamentally flawed the the original finding stands and yes they do clear their name - your ignorance is really astounding.
