lol NRLOL's undesirable time slots of prime time as opposed to the AFL's early afternoons, similar cast on FTA as welleelofwest wrote:So the AFL show 9 games per week and have 30% of the top 100 showsleagueiscrap wrote:yes because many of the AFL games are similar cast on FTA as well! many of the AFL games are played in the early and late afternoons as well where as the NRLOL games are not!eelofwest wrote:#NRL own 49 of Top100 rating sporting events on STV so far this yr, avg 266k. However, 43/49 are MON & SAT 7:30 games
https://twitter.com/RL_Ratings
Yep with 5 games compared to the AFL 9 and no finals games the NRL still has the majority of the large rating games
The 'undesirable' #NRL timeslots FoxSport MAY receive exclusive under new TV deal avg 180k in 2015, AFL STV avg 179k.
The NRL still ave more with undesirable time slots.
With all 8 games simulcasts they will pay a bucket load for 5 years.
attempt to come up with every scenario and excuse you can! the AFL will get more than the NRLOL in the board cast rights & will continue to.
its simple eat shit & move on the NRLOL is second & AFL will only continue to grow bigger at a much faster rate
The NRL show 5 games a week and have 50% of the top 100.
Also the NRL Dregs rate larger (180k ave) then the entire AFL ave on Fox (179k).
Yeahnah NRL smashes AFL to pieces on Pay and Rupert knows it.
Get ready to pay up old man...
give me a fucken break idiot
is that all 1 k difference

so the NRLOL games are not similar cast on FTA, played in the evenings & late afternoons for ratings. the AFL games are similar cast with FTA & played in early after noons

your claiming vistory

Rupert owned a part of the NRLOL and lost hundreds of millions

all he has done with the AFL is brought the rights to the broadcast, the AFL is in charge of its own product!
keep eating those pickles the gap between the two codes will only widen with the NRLOL continue to be the distant second
