Forum Cleanup - topic derailing, posting and proof requirements

[AFLcrap1]

Lol
You say it's a football fight club .
Yet a thread that showed the Aflol in a bad light was locked .
Bias .
You bet .
It broke no rules .
Sources were provided ....many sources .
Yet you still shut it on some flimsy excuse about what a poster called another poster .

That's easily fixed .
Delete the post ...deal with the person who posted it .
That's the usual way things are handled .
Yet you locked the whole thread .

If you want debate about footy fine ..
Get rid of your bias ..
That would be a great start .

[King-Eliagh]

The facts of the matter are I didn't even call anyone anything. I suggested xman could be quite mentally unwell, **** possibly two other things. Personally I really am worries about the blokes character, but that's just my opinion. And I'm allowed to have it.

These thoughts were no reason for the entire thread to be locked. And I'm yet to hear a valid reason for threads being locked. Look I can drop it now if our mods agree that in the case of locked threads they must provide reason to the membership that is not simply about one simple post within the thread. If a post breaks the rules then surely our mods are smart enough to realise the post is the issue in question not the thread... Or are they?

I think it's good practice to keep bias under control by explaining yourselves me mods.

Thanks in advance.

Love you guys



KE - keepin it real and honest in tfc since '04