the odds for the four nations

Foolproof · Post by **Foolproof** » Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:04 pm

In the Asian group one is, Post_hoc. Not the case in Oceania - as we found out against Iran when we were in the Oceania group.

post_hoc · Post by **post_hoc** » Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:11 pm

AFLsforPussies wrote:
Post hoc you know well Asia is one of the lowest standard areas for football in the world. EUROPE, NTH AMERICA, STH AMERICA and AFRICA are all better.

You are the one saying, yet haven't shown anything to support, the complete opposite in fact.

post_hoc · Post by **post_hoc** » Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:21 pm

Ok Japan v
Cameroon played 4 won 3 draw 1
Senegal played 3 0 win draw 1 lost 2
Zambia played 1 1 win
Nigeria played 4 won 2, 1 draw 1 loss

The 4 African nations you chose, Japan has played them a total of 12 times for 6 wins 3 draws and 3 losses

So again your measure chosen comes up short, Japan clearly better than the 4 strong African nations chosen. You clearly don't have a clue

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:54 pm

Starting to get the feeling little pork chop doesn't like my posts, always leaving them even when I go out of my way and quote him.

post_hoc · Post by **post_hoc** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 6:33 am

No, it's more I don't think you added anything, but I am sure when it happens I will respond

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 10:33 am

You answer shit because that's about all you know, I told you who had the biggest rugby comp, you deflected again.

Idiot.

post_hoc · Post by **post_hoc** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 10:56 am

not at all, I just didn't see the point. It was irrelevant to the discussion so I ignored it. I am sorry if that annoyed you but when you are relevant to my discussion I will engage with you. No need to get stroppy, just how it is

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:04 am

post_hoc wrote:
not at all, I just didn't see the point. .

of course you didn't
it made you look like a cockhead

again !!

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Schultz
I see Nussing

I know Nussing

:_<> :_<> :_<>

AFLcrap1 · Post by **AFLcrap1** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:10 am

post_hoc wrote:
not at all, I just didn't see the point. It was irrelevant to the discussion so I ignored it. I am sorry if that annoyed you but when you are relevant to my discussion I will engage with you. No need to get stroppy, just how it is

What discussion porky .
What is the title of this thread?

It went off topic ,& when parra asked a question ,you ignored or deflected ,& only wanted to discuss something that has nothing to do with the 4 nations.
So please answer his question .

****** .

post_hoc · Post by **post_hoc** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:14 am

The discussion on the Liverpool v MV game and the fact that the wrong information was given.

As I said it wasn't relevant to the discussion I was having.

It then appeared he got his nose all out of joint, I'm sorry if his self worth is tied up in having a discussion with me, but I didn't see the relevance in the discussion i was having.

AFLcrap1 · Post by **AFLcrap1** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:17 am

Lol ,
You got smashed .
Lol lol lol .

post_hoc · Post by **post_hoc** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:23 am

AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol ,
You got smashed .
Lol lol lol .

So you say

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:27 am

post_hoc wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol ,
You got smashed .
Lol lol lol .
So you say

so we all say you greasy little tosser

post_hoc · Post by **post_hoc** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:30 am

Excuse me if I don't put much credence in what you say lyingdave, on this board you offer little content of any worth

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:58 pm

post_hoc wrote:
Excuse me if I don't put much credence in what you say lyingdave, on this board you offer little content of any worth

and I can assure you that a lying gutless little wanker like you
has no credence with the membership in here what so ever

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Re: the odds for the four nations

Who is online