
Sydney Swans **** the least supported
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
the Swines were premiers in 2013piesman2011 wrote:
to be well behind a club that has never won a title in 47 seasons in the NRL's Sharks
also some VFL clubs that have been dry for even longer then that
shows their irrelevance in the scheme of things
plus I'd say a lot of their merchandise was purchased in Melbourne ...............
they STILL just aint that popular in their adopted home town

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 1802
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:01 pm
- Team: Sydney FC
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
dave that has to be one of the dumbest things you've said on here which is saying a lot
the sharks are also above the broncos, a team that has a city of over 2 million people to themselves vs the couple hundred thousand people that live in the shire, the broncos have won multiple premierships over the last 20 odd years and play infront of 30k odd every week vs the sharks who are often lucky to play infront of a third of that, what's their excuse you pleb? lmfao!!!!!! :_<>
the sharks are also above the broncos, a team that has a city of over 2 million people to themselves vs the couple hundred thousand people that live in the shire, the broncos have won multiple premierships over the last 20 odd years and play infront of 30k odd every week vs the sharks who are often lucky to play infront of a third of that, what's their excuse you pleb? lmfao!!!!!! :_<>
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been liked: 11 times
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
The swans have got a city of five million and only one AFL team (the other one is not AFL but rather blithering basketcase standard). Yet their sales are still below the sharks and on a par with four other nrl teams? Daves right, they and the AFL are just not loved by many in sydney town, comparatively to rl that is.
dems just the facts folks, just the facts nothing to hAve a cup of tea and a few tears over. 



xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
sydneyfc wrote:dave that has to be one of the dumbest things you've said on here which is saying a lot
the sharks are also above the broncos, a team that has a city of over 2 million people to themselves vs the couple hundred thousand people that live in the shire, the broncos have won multiple premierships over the last 20 odd years and play infront of 30k odd every week vs the sharks who are often lucky to play infront of a third of that, what's their excuse you pleb? lmfao!!!!!! :_<>






the Broncos in premiership year would triple that Sharks figure you bouncing fucktard & quadruple the Swines one






that Swines figure considering they won the comp in 2012
is
pathetic
they are irrelevant in Sydney
end of

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
Are you making a statement or asking a question? Either way work on your maths. The swans made almost 1 million from sales almost double Manly, triple Penrith and five times more than Canterbury. The only NSW club which is close to par is Parra.King-Eliagh wrote:The swans have got a city of five million and only one AFL team (the other one is not AFL but rather blithering basketcase standard). Yet their sales are still below the sharks and on a par with four other nrl teams? Daves right, they and the AFL are just not loved by many in sydney town, comparatively to rl that is.dems just the facts folks, just the facts nothing to hAve a cup of tea and a few tears over.
- leagueiscrap
- Banned
- Posts: 7862
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been liked: 7 times
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
the chart is another indication in the size difference between the AFL and NRL clubs.Raiderdave wrote:the Swines were premiers in 2013piesman2011 wrote:
to be well behind a club that has never won a title in 47 seasons in the NRL's Sharks
also some VFL clubs that have been dry for even longer then that
shows their irrelevance in the scheme of things
plus I'd say a lot of their merchandise was purchased in Melbourne ...............
they STILL just aint that popular in their adopted home town
Hawthorn 3.7 million
Essendon 3.2 million & they didn't even play in the finals series
NRL top 2
sharks 1.3 million
broncos 1.3 million





again showing how minnow the NRL clubs are compared to the AFL clubs

Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
Hmmmmleagueiscrap wrote:the chart is another indication in the size difference between the AFL and NRL clubs.Raiderdave wrote:the Swines were premiers in 2013piesman2011 wrote:
to be well behind a club that has never won a title in 47 seasons in the NRL's Sharks
also some VFL clubs that have been dry for even longer then that
shows their irrelevance in the scheme of things
plus I'd say a lot of their merchandise was purchased in Melbourne ...............
they STILL just aint that popular in their adopted home town
Hawthorn 3.7 million
Essendon 3.2 million & they didn't even play in the finals series
NRL top 2
sharks 1.3 million
broncos 1.3 million
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
again showing how minnow the NRL clubs are compared to the AFL clubs
Top earning NRL club
Penith at 148 million
Top derps n oopsies club
Collingthorn at half that amount



How do ya like them apples you lying *****



RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- leagueiscrap
- Banned
- Posts: 7862
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been liked: 7 times
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
so we need to go over this againRaiderdave wrote:Hmmmmleagueiscrap wrote:the chart is another indication in the size difference between the AFL and NRL clubs.Raiderdave wrote:the Swines were premiers in 2013piesman2011 wrote:
to be well behind a club that has never won a title in 47 seasons in the NRL's Sharks
also some VFL clubs that have been dry for even longer then that
shows their irrelevance in the scheme of things
plus I'd say a lot of their merchandise was purchased in Melbourne ...............
they STILL just aint that popular in their adopted home town
Hawthorn 3.7 million
Essendon 3.2 million & they didn't even play in the finals series
NRL top 2
sharks 1.3 million
broncos 1.3 million
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
again showing how minnow the NRL clubs are compared to the AFL clubs
Top earning NRL club
Penith at 148 million
Top derps n oopsies club
Collingthorn at half that amount![]()
![]()
![]()
How do ya like them apples you lying *****![]()
![]()

so with your claim of 148 million
the penrith panther poke group made
the NRL club made 9.1 million from NRL related activities
6.8 from the NRL distrubutions
pinched 4 million out of its trust fund because the club couldnt come up with the rest needed to run the club
gee where did the rest of the other money come from

POKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!






wow what a power house 70 odd million in debt, on money loaned to them from gus guild managed to borrow off pack.
thanks dave for only proving again how minnow and shit the NRL clubs are compared to the AFL clubs





Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
Yep - pissy pants Dave just doesn't get it - Swanies still the numbers one club in Sydney!!!!
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
One of the major differences between the AFL clubs and the NRL clubs is that the AFL clubs own their pokie machines (hopefully they can dump them soon). However some NRL clubs are owned by the pokie machine operators. Now that the NRL has money its time to fix this.
- leagueiscrap
- Banned
- Posts: 7862
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been liked: 7 times
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
the AFL owns the licences for all of the AFL clubs now days because they have the money. the clubs are slowly buying in to the pokes for another source of incomepiesman2011 wrote:One of the major differences between the AFL clubs and the NRL clubs is that the AFL clubs own their pokie machines (hopefully they can dump them soon). However some NRL clubs are owned by the pokie machine operators. Now that the NRL has money its time to fix this.
the NRL clubs are owned by poke operators/leagues clubs and the wealthy idiot business men like nathan tinkler. who by NRL clubs to use the brand name & tax dodges.
the NRL is far more advanced than the AFL in poke ownership as the NRL clubs have pathetically low earning capacities compared to the AFL clubs

Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
Tell me how any of these pokie palaces owns an NRL clubpiesman2011 wrote:One of the major differences between the AFL clubs and the NRL clubs is that the AFL clubs own their pokie machines (hopefully they can dump them soon). However some NRL clubs are owned by the pokie machine operators. Now that the NRL has money its time to fix this.

signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
Hmmmm, I wonder how many Parra games on a friday night we would need to outrate the whole season from the swans shown in Sydney?
You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?
Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week
You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?
Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week

signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 7542
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
- Team: Melbourne Demons
- Location:
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been liked: 136 times
Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported
70k plus foxtel, so around 100k per home game.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Hmmmm, I wonder how many Parra games on a friday night we would need to outrate the whole season from the swans shown in Sydney?
You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?
Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot] and 5 guests