Just 7,000 NRL viewers for live NRL in MEL, ADE, PER

NRL, State of Origin and International football TV ratings and discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9920
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 232 times
Been liked: 51 times

Just 7,000 NRL viewers for live NRL in MEL, ADE, PER

Post by Beaussie »

Oh deary me. What is going on?

We've been told for years that live Rugby League would rate well if only given the chance in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth. Well the results are in. NRL games have been shown live each and every week in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth this season.

Sunday's live broadcast of Manly vs Parramatta attracted a total audience of 7,000 when shown LIVE in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth to a potential audience of approximately 6.5 million. Again 7,000 from a potential audience of 6.5 million.

7,000 :oops: :oops: :oops:

Friday night LIVE NRL in PRIME TIME from 7:30pm didn't do much better with a total audience of 15,000 from a potential audience of approximately 6.5 million. Channel 9 need to stop the rot asap. How do you justify such rubbish ratings to your shareholders?

Hmm, just thinking, how does the NRL demand it gets $1 billion in its next tv rights negotiations? You'd be nuts as a tv executive to fall for that rubbish. Nuts I tell ya.
Mediaweek‏@MediaweekAUS

Sun TV ‪#NRL‬ 414k (Nine) + 7k (GEM)

Fri TV ‪#NRL‬ 683k (Syd 460k Mel 13k Bri 207k Ade 1k Per 2k) ‪#NRLWSTCBY‬

http://twitter.com/mediaweekaus
User avatar
cos789
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Just 7,000 NRL viewers for live NRL in MEL, ADE, PER

Post by cos789 »

Looking at those figures the VFL, WAFL and SANFL > NRL.
IMO we should have a second tier national competition.

.
Nice try Cos.
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9920
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 232 times
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Just 7,000 NRL viewers for live NRL in MEL, ADE, PER

Post by Beaussie »

cos789 wrote:
Looking at those figures the VFL, WAFL and SANFL > NRL.
Indeed cos.

Still cannot understand why the NRL talks about Perth for possible expansion.

Live NRL last night in Perth rated 10k :?>

Then again, in Melbourne with the top of the table Storm, live NRL only rated 12k last night. :oops:
Mediaweek‏@MediaweekAUS

Fri TV ‪#NRL‬ 762k early (Syd 415k Mel 12k Bri 322k Ade 3k Per 10k)

http://twitter.com/mediaweekaus
The tv ratings for live/prime time NRL in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth continue to be truly tragic. $1 Billion.... tell em they're dreamin... :lol:
User avatar
cos789
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Just 7,000 NRL viewers for live NRL in MEL, ADE, PER

Post by cos789 »

Beaussie wrote:
cos789 wrote:
Looking at those figures the VFL, WAFL and SANFL > NRL.
Indeed cos.

Still cannot understand why the NRL talks about Perth for possible expansion.

Live NRL last night in Perth rated 10k :?>
How do they expect to get more people to the game than watch it on TV???

.
Nice try Cos.
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9920
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 232 times
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Just 7,000 NRL viewers for live NRL in MEL, ADE, PER

Post by Beaussie »

cos789 wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
cos789 wrote:
Looking at those figures the VFL, WAFL and SANFL > NRL.
Indeed cos.

Still cannot understand why the NRL talks about Perth for possible expansion.

Live NRL last night in Perth rated 10k :?>
How do they expect to get more people to the game than watch it on TV???

.
Good question. Don't think they have properly thought this one through. The broadcasters certainly ain't interested in paying anything more for 7,000 viewers out of a potential auidence of 6.5 million. Add to that every current club bar one runs at a massive loss. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Expansion decisions are in the wind but may not be what wannabe clubs want to hear
Date: July 15 2012
Adrian Proszenko

Potential new franchises will soon get an answer on NRL expansion - but it's unlikely to be the one they're hoping to hear. Sin Bin has been told the ARLC is likely to make a definitive call on whether to expand in late August, around the time the television rights deal has been thrashed out. Should they decide to increase the number of teams, prospective franchises will be given four or five months to put in bids with a view to NRL entry in 2015. However, it's becoming increasingly likely the status quo will remain and they will have to wait longer still. While the broadcasters are always looking for more quality content, it's believed - at least in initial discussions - their appetite for more games isn't matched by a dollar commitment that would make new clubs feasible. The commission is also mindful that most existing clubs are running at a loss and extra teams would only further dilute the playing talent.

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... =text-only
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests