NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
-
- Seniors
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:50 am
- Team: Newcastle Knights
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
an excerpt http://www.theaustralian.com.au/medi...-1226327247388
One gaping hole in Ten's armoury that Mr Warburton will tackle is sports broadcasting rights, after it ditched its AFL matches last year.
Nine is in talks with the NRL as the incumbent rights holder, but Mr Warburton is hoping that after their period of exclusivity ends a multi-screen viewing experience strategy across social media, smartphones, tablets and other new media devices will help him snare some NRL rights for Ten.
"It didn't make sense financially to continue with AFL, but there are some major sports rights up for grabs up until 2014. We will look at everything on an individual basis.
One gaping hole in Ten's armoury that Mr Warburton will tackle is sports broadcasting rights, after it ditched its AFL matches last year.
Nine is in talks with the NRL as the incumbent rights holder, but Mr Warburton is hoping that after their period of exclusivity ends a multi-screen viewing experience strategy across social media, smartphones, tablets and other new media devices will help him snare some NRL rights for Ten.
"It didn't make sense financially to continue with AFL, but there are some major sports rights up for grabs up until 2014. We will look at everything on an individual basis.
- eelofwest
- Coach
- Posts: 2717
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:15 pm
- Team: Eels
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Link no work JALF.justanotherleaguefan wrote:an excerpt http://www.theaustralian.com.au/medi...-1226327247388
One gaping hole in Ten's armoury that Mr Warburton will tackle is sports broadcasting rights, after it ditched its AFL matches last year.
Nine is in talks with the NRL as the incumbent rights holder, but Mr Warburton is hoping that after their period of exclusivity ends a multi-screen viewing experience strategy across social media, smartphones, tablets and other new media devices will help him snare some NRL rights for Ten.
"It didn't make sense financially to continue with AFL, but there are some major sports rights up for grabs up until 2014. We will look at everything on an individual basis.
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 232 times
- Been liked: 51 times
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Channel 10 is now broke and smashed each and every week since losing the AFL. Channel 7 continues to dominate the ratings and has actually increased it's lead and strengthened it's position as Australia's number one tv network now that it has the AFL without having to share the spoils with Channel 10. Having the number one football code in the land... the jewel in the crown of Australian sport will always provide that.
-
- Seniors
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:50 am
- Team: Newcastle Knights
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Ten, Facebook explore alliance
TEN Network and Facebook are in advanced talks about forging a strategic alliance in which the two media companies would share content, audiences and advertising revenue, sources have confirmed.
Such a deal would see Facebook emerge as the digital entity that would allow Ten to go to market with a full suite of media assets to sell to advertisers.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/medi...-1226327247388
Does this mean Murdoch has got Facebook involved in the TV rights?
That would be groundbreaking...
TEN Network and Facebook are in advanced talks about forging a strategic alliance in which the two media companies would share content, audiences and advertising revenue, sources have confirmed.
Such a deal would see Facebook emerge as the digital entity that would allow Ten to go to market with a full suite of media assets to sell to advertisers.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/medi...-1226327247388
Does this mean Murdoch has got Facebook involved in the TV rights?
That would be groundbreaking...
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Beaussie wrote:Channel 10 is now broke and smashed each and every week since losing the AFL. Channel 7 continues to dominate the ratings and has actually increased it's lead and strengthened it's position as Australia's number one tv network now that it has the AFL without having to share the spoils with Channel 10. Having the number one football code in the land... the jewel in the crown of Australian sport will always provide that.
oh yr a funny one bearsy
the VFL ... a jewel in the crown
its a national embarrasment .....
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Hmm more than double the crowds, members, revenue, media interest, and way more tv ratings. If this is an embarrassment what the hell is the nRL?Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Channel 10 is now broke and smashed each and every week since losing the AFL. Channel 7 continues to dominate the ratings and has actually increased it's lead and strengthened it's position as Australia's number one tv network now that it has the AFL without having to share the spoils with Channel 10. Having the number one football code in the land... the jewel in the crown of Australian sport will always provide that.
oh yr a funny one bearsy
the VFL ... a jewel in the crown
its a national embarrasment .....
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
will be less then double the crowds by years end ( used to be 3 times )Xman wrote:Hmm more than double the crowds, members, revenue, media interest, and way more tv ratings. If this is an embarrassment what the hell is the nRL?Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Channel 10 is now broke and smashed each and every week since losing the AFL. Channel 7 continues to dominate the ratings and has actually increased it's lead and strengthened it's position as Australia's number one tv network now that it has the AFL without having to share the spoils with Channel 10. Having the number one football code in the land... the jewel in the crown of Australian sport will always provide that.
oh yr a funny one bearsy
the VFL ... a jewel in the crown
its a national embarrasment .....
we had 60K members in 2005 .. will have 220K in 2012 ... a 350% increase
revenue will be on par within 5 years ( however ... VFL losses will be double the NRL's )
zero media interest in vicky kicky in NSW QLD & the ACT ( only the stuff the VFL PAYS for from the Nthn media )
& being smashed in TV ratings by the country's most watched sport .. RL
like I said .. VFL ... a joke
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
When, if, will.........Raiderdave wrote:will be less then double the crowds by years end ( used to be 3 times )Xman wrote:Hmm more than double the crowds, members, revenue, media interest, and way more tv ratings. If this is an embarrassment what the hell is the nRL?Raiderdave wrote:
oh yr a funny one bearsy
the VFL ... a jewel in the crown
its a national embarrasment .....
we had 60K members in 2005 .. will have 220K in 2012 ... a 350% increase
revenue will be on par within 5 years ( however ... VFL losses will be double the NRL's )
zero media interest in vicky kicky in NSW QLD & the ACT ( only the stuff the VFL PAYS for from the Nthn media )
& being smashed in TV ratings by the country's most watched sport .. RL
like I said .. VFL ... a joke
You're the joke!
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
- Team: The Shanghai Sharks
- Location: far away
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport!
"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
-
- Seniors
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:50 am
- Team: Newcastle Knights
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/l...418-1x7q4.html
Expansion connected to new TV rights deal
April 19, 2012
Strong interest by broadcasters in a second Brisbane team may prompt the ARL Commission to ask TV networks to lodge a separate rights bid for an 18-team competition.
Both Fox Sports and Channel Nine are keen to televise a second Brisbane team and capitalise on the parochial ratings of Queenslanders.
With only three Queensland NRL teams in its 16-team competition - Brisbane, North Queensland and Gold Coast - Nine is frequently frustrated finding enough Queensland teams to schedule for its Friday night double header and its Sunday afternoon coverage.
Advertisement: Story continues below
Ratings are traditionally down in Queensland when Nine shows an all-Sydney game on Sundays, such as the recent Penrith-Wests Tigers match.
Fox Sports also suffers because the free-to-air coverage of the three Queensland teams means there is less incentive for northerners to take up Foxtel subscriptions.
While Sydney subscriptions are approximately 40 per cent of households, Brisbane is in the 33 to 35 per cent range.
Nine boss David Gyngell has intimated he would pay an additional $100 million over five years in broadcast fees should a second Brisbane team be accepted, even as a 17th team, meaning a bye and the existing eight matches each week.
Broadcasters bidding for TV rights have been told to tender on the basis of a 16-team competition but ARLC chief executive David Gallop has said expansion could be factored into negotiations.
''We obviously would be interested to know what value broadcasters place on a ninth match,'' Gallop said.
A ninth match, meaning an 18th team, would draw even more broadcasting revenue, with the AFL acknowledging it drew an additional $150 million from the introduction of the low rating Gold Coast Suns and Greater Western Sydney Giants.
Perth is widely regarded as the best option as an 18th team, given the opportunity it presents with an additional time zone. However, both Nine and Fox Sports have expressed lukewarm interest in a Perth team.
This may change if Channel Seven becomes an active bidder for the rights. Seven, unlike Nine, owns the Perth channel.
Gallop has told the Perth and Queensland bids that the commission would be unlikely to address the question of expansion until August and even then may announce there will be no new teams during the life of the next broadcast contract.
This has not deterred the Western Australia Reds spending significant sums rebranding the team.
The Brisbane Bombers, who are investing in financial modelling, are well advanced with their case to enter the competition in 2015. They point out there are only 12 games, barring finals, in Brisbane each year - compared with Sydney's 108 - and a second Brisbane team would mean the 52,000-seat Suncorp Stadium, one of Australia's best arenas, would be used for rugby league each week during the winter. A second Brisbane team offers the opportunity to break the seven-day cycle the Broncos enjoy, a privilege that antagonises other clubs.
Channel Nine's regular Friday night choice of the Broncos means the Brisbane club has a regular preparation routine, with players enjoying the weekend off, unlike teams that play on Monday nights and back up five days later on Saturdays.
If a second Brisbane team was introduced, along with fixed scheduling, the Broncos could play alternate Fridays and Sundays.
The Broncos also have cash reserves of $13.8 million, greater than the turnover of some of the NRL's poorest clubs, such as Cronulla.
Many sponsorship opportunities are lost to rugby league in Brisbane because of the exclusive deals businesses make with the Broncos, shutting out rivals.
Ipswich has also mounted a bid but the provincial city, given it provided the Walters brothers and Allan Langer, is perceived as a cheer squad for the Broncos.
A central Queensland bid is also well advanced and is led by one of the state's richest men, Geoff Murphy. A beef baron, Murphy says a Rockhampton-based team would be owned by the community, although he would maintain a significant shareholding.
''We want to capitalise on the huge playing numbers in the region,'' he said. ''The new Queensland government have promised us a 20,000-seat stadium if we win a licence.''
Murphy said a report he commissioned with LEK's Colin Smith demonstrated that an additional Queensland team would add significant extra value to a broadcasting contract. The ARLC will obviously monitor the financial health of the Titans before making any decision on a fourth Queensland team.
Expansion connected to new TV rights deal
April 19, 2012
Strong interest by broadcasters in a second Brisbane team may prompt the ARL Commission to ask TV networks to lodge a separate rights bid for an 18-team competition.
Both Fox Sports and Channel Nine are keen to televise a second Brisbane team and capitalise on the parochial ratings of Queenslanders.
With only three Queensland NRL teams in its 16-team competition - Brisbane, North Queensland and Gold Coast - Nine is frequently frustrated finding enough Queensland teams to schedule for its Friday night double header and its Sunday afternoon coverage.
Advertisement: Story continues below
Ratings are traditionally down in Queensland when Nine shows an all-Sydney game on Sundays, such as the recent Penrith-Wests Tigers match.
Fox Sports also suffers because the free-to-air coverage of the three Queensland teams means there is less incentive for northerners to take up Foxtel subscriptions.
While Sydney subscriptions are approximately 40 per cent of households, Brisbane is in the 33 to 35 per cent range.
Nine boss David Gyngell has intimated he would pay an additional $100 million over five years in broadcast fees should a second Brisbane team be accepted, even as a 17th team, meaning a bye and the existing eight matches each week.
Broadcasters bidding for TV rights have been told to tender on the basis of a 16-team competition but ARLC chief executive David Gallop has said expansion could be factored into negotiations.
''We obviously would be interested to know what value broadcasters place on a ninth match,'' Gallop said.
A ninth match, meaning an 18th team, would draw even more broadcasting revenue, with the AFL acknowledging it drew an additional $150 million from the introduction of the low rating Gold Coast Suns and Greater Western Sydney Giants.
Perth is widely regarded as the best option as an 18th team, given the opportunity it presents with an additional time zone. However, both Nine and Fox Sports have expressed lukewarm interest in a Perth team.
This may change if Channel Seven becomes an active bidder for the rights. Seven, unlike Nine, owns the Perth channel.
Gallop has told the Perth and Queensland bids that the commission would be unlikely to address the question of expansion until August and even then may announce there will be no new teams during the life of the next broadcast contract.
This has not deterred the Western Australia Reds spending significant sums rebranding the team.
The Brisbane Bombers, who are investing in financial modelling, are well advanced with their case to enter the competition in 2015. They point out there are only 12 games, barring finals, in Brisbane each year - compared with Sydney's 108 - and a second Brisbane team would mean the 52,000-seat Suncorp Stadium, one of Australia's best arenas, would be used for rugby league each week during the winter. A second Brisbane team offers the opportunity to break the seven-day cycle the Broncos enjoy, a privilege that antagonises other clubs.
Channel Nine's regular Friday night choice of the Broncos means the Brisbane club has a regular preparation routine, with players enjoying the weekend off, unlike teams that play on Monday nights and back up five days later on Saturdays.
If a second Brisbane team was introduced, along with fixed scheduling, the Broncos could play alternate Fridays and Sundays.
The Broncos also have cash reserves of $13.8 million, greater than the turnover of some of the NRL's poorest clubs, such as Cronulla.
Many sponsorship opportunities are lost to rugby league in Brisbane because of the exclusive deals businesses make with the Broncos, shutting out rivals.
Ipswich has also mounted a bid but the provincial city, given it provided the Walters brothers and Allan Langer, is perceived as a cheer squad for the Broncos.
A central Queensland bid is also well advanced and is led by one of the state's richest men, Geoff Murphy. A beef baron, Murphy says a Rockhampton-based team would be owned by the community, although he would maintain a significant shareholding.
''We want to capitalise on the huge playing numbers in the region,'' he said. ''The new Queensland government have promised us a 20,000-seat stadium if we win a licence.''
Murphy said a report he commissioned with LEK's Colin Smith demonstrated that an additional Queensland team would add significant extra value to a broadcasting contract. The ARLC will obviously monitor the financial health of the Titans before making any decision on a fourth Queensland team.
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
HmmmmmGallop has told the Perth and Queensland bids that the commission would be unlikely to address the question of expansion until August and even then may announce there will be no new teams during the life of the next broadcast contract.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
next to zero chance of this occuringXman wrote:HmmmmmGallop has told the Perth and Queensland bids that the commission would be unlikely to address the question of expansion until August and even then may announce there will be no new teams during the life of the next broadcast contract.
2015 ... 18 teams ... Perth & a 2nd Brisbane side coming in
lock it in
its as good as done.
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Is that because of the massive ratings RL is getting in Perth?Raiderdave wrote:next to zero chance of this occuringXman wrote:HmmmmmGallop has told the Perth and Queensland bids that the commission would be unlikely to address the question of expansion until August and even then may announce there will be no new teams during the life of the next broadcast contract.
2015 ... 18 teams ... Perth & a 2nd Brisbane side coming in
lock it in
its as good as done.
Even the new RL commission seem to have gone cold on NRL expansion.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
this is because of the extra live TV time slots they can add to a broadcasters scheduleXman wrote:Is that because of the massive ratings RL is getting in Perth?Raiderdave wrote:next to zero chance of this occuringXman wrote:Hmmmmm
2015 ... 18 teams ... Perth & a 2nd Brisbane side coming in
lock it in
its as good as done.
Even the new RL commission seem to have gone cold on NRL expansion.
tens of millions a year
& unlike the VFL's new sides .. leeches sucking the life out of its comp like a vacume cleaner .. this Perth team will be self funded .. by billionaires
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Like Clive Palmer?Raiderdave wrote:this is because of the extra live TV time slots they can add to a broadcasters scheduleXman wrote:Is that because of the massive ratings RL is getting in Perth?Raiderdave wrote:next to zero chance of this occuring
2015 ... 18 teams ... Perth & a 2nd Brisbane side coming in
lock it in
its as good as done.
Even the new RL commission seem to have gone cold on NRL expansion.
tens of millions a year
& unlike the VFL's new sides .. leeches sucking the life out of its comp like a vacume cleaner .. this Perth team will be self funded .. by billionaires
They'll get little support because grass roots RL in WA is virtually non existent. Therefore the reds players will be foreigners from the east coast and the team ignored like the storm in Melbourne. When these billionaires lose interest because of the money pit they're pack up shop.
Nice plan.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests