1.253 Billion says it all Dave!Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:LOL yeah, 439k live on Sunday. The AFL beats that for delayed games!Raiderdave wrote:yet
it STILL outrates the VFL
134 Million
to 120 Million
the VFL beats .......... nothing
NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
the dud in the sack strikes again .......... ol premature ejaculator marcusXman wrote:1.253 Billion says it all Dave!Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:LOL yeah, 439k live on Sunday. The AFL beats that for delayed games!
134 Million
to 120 Million
the VFL beats .......... nothing
whop n bucket in aisle 7........
steady on
wait
hold it
breath
cos
our deal isn't done yet
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
Oh Dave! Need you be so crude?
The last deal heavily favoured the AFL. Even most NRL fans believe they'll get less than the AFL!
Stop being yourself, stupid!
The last deal heavily favoured the AFL. Even most NRL fans believe they'll get less than the AFL!
Stop being yourself, stupid!
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
the last deal... is the last dealXman wrote:Oh Dave! Need you be so crude?
The last deal heavily favoured the AFL. Even most NRL fans believe they'll get less than the AFL!
Stop being yourself, stupid!
hold onto yr load .. til we have our deal in place
& think of yr missus for once ........
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
The last deal was for a reason, not just dumb luck. The new one will reflect the advantage the AFL have because of its national appeal. The NRL is relevant to 2 states onlyRaiderdave wrote:the last deal... is the last dealXman wrote:Oh Dave! Need you be so crude?
The last deal heavily favoured the AFL. Even most NRL fans believe they'll get less than the AFL!
Stop being yourself, stupid!
hold onto yr load .. til we have our deal in place
& think of yr missus for once ........
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
Xman wrote:The last deal was for a reason, not just dumb luck. The new one will reflect the advantage the AFL have because of its national appeal. The NRL is relevant to 2 states onlyRaiderdave wrote:the last deal... is the last dealXman wrote:Oh Dave! Need you be so crude?
The last deal heavily favoured the AFL. Even most NRL fans believe they'll get less than the AFL!
Stop being yourself, stupid!
hold onto yr load .. til we have our deal in place
& think of yr missus for once ........
the old NRL deal was an anomaly ... a circumstantial situation as a result mainly of the superleague war
completely undervalued
we won't miss out this time
if we don't beat the VFL deal.... we'll go very close
& the deal after this one
WILL be the biggest in Aust Sport .... bar none
NRL .. KING
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
If the NRL was tv king it would be paid as such. It isn't and almost everyone thinks it still won't. That indicates which sport is king!Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:The last deal was for a reason, not just dumb luck. The new one will reflect the advantage the AFL have because of its national appeal. The NRL is relevant to 2 states onlyRaiderdave wrote:the last deal... is the last deal
hold onto yr load .. til we have our deal in place
& think of yr missus for once ........
the old NRL deal was an anomaly ... a circumstantial situation as a result mainly of the superleague war
completely undervalued
we won't miss out this time
if we don't beat the VFL deal.... we'll go very close
& the deal after this one
WILL be the biggest in Aust Sport .... bar none
NRL .. KING
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
it isn't yet .. it will ... its the better TV game ... its the better sportXman wrote:If the NRL was tv king it would be paid as such. It isn't and almost everyone thinks it still won't. That indicates which sport is king!Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:The last deal was for a reason, not just dumb luck. The new one will reflect the advantage the AFL have because of its national appeal. The NRL is relevant to 2 states only
the old NRL deal was an anomaly ... a circumstantial situation as a result mainly of the superleague war
completely undervalued
we won't miss out this time
if we don't beat the VFL deal.... we'll go very close
& the deal after this one
WILL be the biggest in Aust Sport .... bar none
NRL .. KING
it has more then club football to offer
its popular in the right states
its watched by more people right now
TV execs I think now know this .... they're clammering for it
who knows
we may be in for a wonderful surprise as early as July 2012
& you
your worst nightmare
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: NRL = TV Ratings Poison in Melbourne, Adelaide & Perth
Correction, it's crap live because little if any action happens, so people prefer it on TV. It goes for less time so it doesn't suffer from averaging. If it was a better sport people would go and soak up the atmosphere. We both know they don't.
It won't beat the current AFL deal. Why would tv networks pay equal amount for 16hrs of NRL which rates in two states compared to 27 hours of AFL which rates well in 3 states plus some in 2 othere? Youre deluded.
It won't beat the current AFL deal. Why would tv networks pay equal amount for 16hrs of NRL which rates in two states compared to 27 hours of AFL which rates well in 3 states plus some in 2 othere? Youre deluded.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests