no .... AFL Warrior .. or W@nker or whateva his name is .. didBeaussie wrote:Yes indeed, take note Raider who started that rubbish.enarelle wrote:Mum always said that when the "opposition' resorted to silly name calling you clearly had them beat on the facts of the argument.
As for tv ratings, gees, you know you've lost the battle when you need to include NZ figures to beat the AFL's AUS figures. Desperate comes to mind.
mate the AFL is run by ********enarelle wrote:Prize dopes those guys at the NRL. I told them years ago not to expand outside Australia or go regional because the AFL mob would not "let" them count the numbers in any shape or form.
They stupidly plunged on and also promoted SOO without getting the AFLs "permission" to say this was ok.
The NRL really needs to understand that if the AFL hasnt got it or cannot do it then it is not allowed to count.
Still havent seem them deal with the outcomes of the last two Repucom reports that showed NRL with the greater and growing TV ratings.
Perhaps Repucom never got AFL approval to do the numbers.
One does start to really understand what "Aussie RULES" actually means.
:_<> :_<> :_<> 
No you started it all sometime ago. I can get the link and date of your post but wont bother as we all know it was you who kicked things off. As enarelle's mum would suggest, you clearly had been beat on the facts of the argument.Raiderdave wrote:no .... AFL Warrior .. or W@nker or whateva his name is .. didBeaussie wrote:Yes indeed, take note Raider who started that rubbish.enarelle wrote:Mum always said that when the "opposition' resorted to silly name calling you clearly had them beat on the facts of the argument.
As for tv ratings, gees, you know you've lost the battle when you need to include NZ figures to beat the AFL's AUS figures. Desperate comes to mind.
beaussie wrong ..... again
for the 40th time this week
of course you won'tBeaussie wrote:No you started it all sometime ago. I can get the link and date of your post but wont bother as we all know it was you who kicked things off. As enarelle's mum would suggest, you clearly had been beat on the facts of the argument.Raiderdave wrote:no .... AFL Warrior .. or W@nker or whateva his name is .. didBeaussie wrote:Yes indeed, take note Raider who started that rubbish.
As for tv ratings, gees, you know you've lost the battle when you need to include NZ figures to beat the AFL's AUS figures. Desperate comes to mind.
beaussie wrong ..... again
for the 40th time this week
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests
