NRL Smashing the AFL in Finals Ratings

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:38 am

Says it all really when a few novelty games between two states is bigger than your actual NRL premiership season.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:52 am

AFL Warrior wrote:
What is Vicky Kicky? Suppose NRL then is called "Packy Rapey"

Vicky Kicky ..aka AFL
also known as
boggerball
flogball
feebleball
fumbelball

knockupateenagegirlthenleaveher ball

you get the drift

AFL Warrior · Post by **AFL Warrior** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:58 am

Packy Rapey Ball aka NRL
also known as
throwball
bendoverinfrontofmeball
thugball
lowiqball
bashpregnatwomenball
glasswomaninfaceball

you get the drift

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:00 pm

Nice one Warrior.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm

Beaussie wrote:
Says it all really when a few novelty games between two states is bigger than your actual NRL premiership season.

our code has dimension... levels , club football ... state football ... international football

meanwhile your code , only has a club comp

& a pretty cr@p one at that

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:04 pm

AFL Warrior wrote:
Packy Rapey Ball aka NRL
also known as
throwball
bendoverinfrontofmeball
thugball
lowiqball
bashpregnatwomenball
glasswomaninfaceball

you get the drift

stickinsectball
singletball
takeaphotowhilei'mwanking ball
whywouldyoutakeaphotoofanudeguy ball
oh &
thenstoreitonyourcomputer ball

AFL Warrior · Post by **AFL Warrior** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:15 pm

But wait there's more

Iamsosorryfordrivingdrunkball
Getanothertattooofadeadrelativeball
Iamnotaustralianball
Takephotoonmeinpoolgettingclosetoanotherplayerball
Playatemptystadiumball
Dobinmatetocopsforglassingwomaninfacewhenwasmyfaultball
Attackseventeenyearoldgirlinstairwellball
Verballyabusesponsorsdaughterball

=D>

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:15 pm

Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Says it all really when a few novelty games between two states is bigger than your actual NRL premiership season.
our code has dimension...

Yeah, throw a ball backwards to go forward and very rarely even kick the ball. Football they say... Throwball more like it. Hmm, how ********.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:25 pm

Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Says it all really when a few novelty games between two states is bigger than your actual NRL premiership season.
our code has dimension...
Yeah, throw a ball backwards to go forward and very rarely even kick the ball. Football they say... Throwball more like it. Hmm, how ********.

or AFL

fumble ... bumble
stumble

miss
fall over .... adjust your singlet

then repeat

:_<>

:_<>

what a cr@p game ..... :_<>

:_<>

enarelle · Post by **enarelle** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:28 pm

Mum always said that when the "opposition' resorted to silly name calling you clearly had them beat on the facts of the argument.

In a few weeks Repucom will give the full detailed TV ratings for the year which will show that NRL will have a considerably higher aggregate TV audience for the year than the AFL.

How do we know this? Well because they had an 8m advantage last year with 2 AFL grand finals being played.

The AFL fan will then resort to the 'example of one' to prove otherwise eg the one game where AFL out rated NRL, where the Storm got a poor TV Rating etc

Of course it is not the battles but the war that matters and that is going the NRLs way.

Dogs · Post by **Dogs** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:32 pm

enarelle wrote:
Mum always said that when the "opposition' resorted to silly name calling you clearly had them beat on the facts of the argument.

In a few weeks Repucom will give the full detailed TV ratings for the year which will show that NRL will have a considerably higher aggregate TV audience for the year than the AFL.

How do we know this? Well because they had an 8m advantage last year with 2 AFL grand finals being played.

The AFL fan will then resort to the 'example of one' to prove otherwise eg the one game where AFL out rated NRL, where the Storm got a poor TV Rating etc

Of course it is not the battles but the war that matters and that is going the NRLs way.

If there out in the next few weeks, that will obviously mean the four nations viewers will not be included? So your saying we will kick the AFL's arse in the ratings as it stands now and there are still a number of RL games that aren't even in the count. =D> Given NZ are also in our competition and there was 692K who watched only the GF, the viewer over there should be included in our numbers on a RL v AFL competition. It's going to be a smashing

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:58 pm

enarelle wrote:
Mum always said that when the "opposition' resorted to silly name calling you clearly had them beat on the facts of the argument.

Yes indeed, take note Raider who started that rubbish.

As for tv ratings, gees, you know you've lost the battle when you need to include NZ figures to beat the AFL's AUS figures. Desperate comes to mind.

enarelle · Post by **enarelle** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:25 pm

Prize dopes those guys at the NRL. I told them years ago not to expand outside Australia or go regional because the AFL mob would not "let" them count the numbers in any shape or form.

They stupidly plunged on and also promoted SOO without getting the AFLs "permission" to say this was ok.

The NRL really needs to understand that if the AFL hasnt got it or cannot do it then it is not allowed to count.

Still havent seem them deal with the outcomes of the last two Repucom reports that showed NRL with the greater and growing TV ratings.

Perhaps Repucom never got AFL approval to do the numbers.

One does start to really understand what "Aussie RULES" actually means.

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:43 pm

enarelle wrote:
Prize dopes those guys at the NRL.

One does start to really understand what "Aussie RULES" actually means.

Yes, indeed. :D

And growing NRL tv audience you say... hmm:

AFL beats NRL in grand final TV ratings. A hands-down ratings win to the AFL over the NRL at the weekend, thanks to a bigger metro audience, especially in the AFL heartland of Melbourne. While the AFL grand finalâ€™s national audience for the Collingwood-Geelong match was slightly better than last year, the NRL grand finalâ€™s average was the lowest for 11 years as Manly held off the New Zealand Warriors.

http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/03/med ... abc-chair/

enarelle · Post by **enarelle** » Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:11 pm

Yep growing the TV ratings not in this game or that but overall which is what counts.

Also growing it in other countries and regional areas - without AFL approval

Keep telling you about the independent Repucom report which gave the NRL a 8m lead over the AFL last year. Have not seen from any AFL fan a counter claim/argument to this just a continual dodge into the "example of one" which is always "surprisingly" where the AFL can win.

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

NRL Smashing the AFL in Finals Ratings

Who is online