The most recent event!
The nrlol caught out fudging it’s finals series crowds! That’s after they discounted tickets to $15 dollars and even resourting to handing out free tickets still needed to fudge the final crowd numbers
Hahahaha exactly same usual BSAFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:48 amBullshit there is no evidence at all in that article.
Just some vague accusation lol by News LTD.
No nothing no evidence
Just the usual crap.
When you get some evidence please post it .
Any of the following wil be fine
NRL coming out & admitting .
Any of the Stadia involved backing up the accusation..as yet ..silence ..
Read the article fuckhead!
Proof is in the paper spazza
We must sometimes cut the missing link some slack. He can only read things like this:
Oh dear Fred. All of this has been explained to you before.Fred wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:46 pmYou mean the nrl denied the claim .... well I’ll be.... I would have thought they would have just plain confess???
And aflcrap... you think journalists reveal sources ??? Come on. Someone leaked this for good reason. Only a fool would not suspect something. Shit... if I were the nrl I’d try and inflate the crowd figures to.
Anyway... you asked for done evidence and there you have it. Don’t see the nrl pulling the guy up and dyeing him for liable ??? Haven’t gone on the front foot to fiercely deny?? A small statement when asked of double speak that they are confident ... I reckon they count ground staff, media etc hence they are confident.
Oh dear!!!!! Are you one of those blokes that tries to drown fish Fred Lolololololololololoolol. Thought so!!!!Fred wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2017 4:42 pmYou show a lack of understanding of journalism. During your next stint have a read. Do you think journalists give up sources? No. Why.... I’m sure you can work it out.
So there is an article but you’re melting the journalist made it up despite editorial controls that would likely cover this. No complaints from the nrl re article ... no complaints to the industry watchdog about it ... nothing. Yet as it does not support the claim of no fudging you prefer not to accept.
Not sure what else you wrote but I am sure I saved valuable time
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests