A thorough and clear reason why marngrook goes ok on the cwowds and membership front

[King-Eliagh]

It's just pretty shithouse on the tele.

http://m.theage.com.au/entertainment/tv ... 1c6eo.html

I mean, you just don't see such a thorough and clear description against the other codes...do you?

[leagueiscrap]

Richard Hinds
Richard Hinds
Richard Hinds is the Chief Sports Columnist for The Sydney Morning Herald

eg typical insecure sydney flog


article from march 24 2011
busy day down in the basement ay Eliagh?
are you ever going to stop wasting my tax dollars trolling AFL related stuff out of jealousy and bitterness, just like the rest of your fellow ****** mates?

[AFLcrap1]

Lol
You have av go at KE about a 4 yr old article .
When you post articles that are older than that .
Lol you are backward .

[Raiderdave]

Lol
You have av go at KE about a 4 yr old article .
When you post articles that are older than that .
Lol you are backward .

well

he is the flog of the month afterall .... again

[King-Eliagh]

Who gives two shits about the age of the article when it's still oh so relevant. I simply recalled the article from memory when I thought of the reason afl footy does ok in memberships and cwowds.

Jesus adumb, while you're trying to be clever you've really managed to muff the reason why other more intelligent members use the 'out of date' article argument