Sure what about the repeated lies about what I post?Xman wrote:Any chance you could refrain from repeated personal attacks of this nature? That term can cause offence, is unnecessary, and doesn't add weight to your argument.AFLcrap1 wrote:TLPG wrote:You're right, NRLC. Or rather - one can't reason with a now proven spoilt brat who doesn't know how to behave like an adult. And use useless pictures (like he did in the other thread) that make absolutely no sense to someone like me who has no idea who "Lionel" is. Must be a kids thing given that the picture looks like a Simpsons character.
No point continuing with this. AFLC is a nutcase like Raider, and I'm calling this now. He is a meat puppet of Raider. Not a sock puppet. A meat puppet. And I suspect, NRLC, that he came here because Raider was and is afraid of you and he needed help. That's why the mocking of your username with his.
******.
What about this.
He is a meat puppet of Raider
One rule for Fumblers ,another for RL fans.
So tell me Xman .
How can I be continually accused of saying something,whenit is a blatant lie,or some fucked up logic that would get most people committed,yet it is let go .
The bloke has mental problems ,I am just highlighting them ..
When he admits to lying about me ,I will debate whatever he wants,
But I will not argue with someone,who's whole argument is based on what he thinks I said,not WHAT I said.
He can take his fucked up logic elsewhere.