BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL than..

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
NSWAFL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2403
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL th

Post by NSWAFL »

WHAT??

PNG Population: 6,187,591
Land mass: 178,703 sq miles

Nauru Population: 9,322
Land mass: 8.1 sq miles

How can one possible make a comparison here and be relevant? Seriously! Anyway, RL has a much longer laundry list of lying that AFL has ever had. We only have to see how many times we've caught the RL out, and the number of times AFL has been caught out can be counted on one hand.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL th

Post by Xman »

NSWAFL wrote:
WHAT??

PNG Population: 6,187,591
Land mass: 178,703 sq miles

Nauru Population: 9,322
Land mass: 8.1 sq miles

How can one possible make a comparison here and be relevant? Seriously! Anyway, RL has a much longer laundry list of lying that AFL has ever had. We only have to see how many times we've caught the RL out, and the number of times AFL has been caught out can be counted on one hand.
The comparison is not the size but the level of development, infrastructure, poverty etc....

Once we start discounting code officials without proof we are heading down a very slippery slope.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
cos789
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL th

Post by cos789 »

Xman wrote:
Nauru is a good example .
No it's not.
Nauru is a close knit island community.
85% of PNG live in rural poverty and rugged isolation.
Xman wrote:
I'm not sure how we can insist others believe every comment from the AFL if we then refuse to believe comments from RL officials.
He gave a definition of "participants" that's different to what we use.
Xman wrote:
There was no proof to the contrary just a plea to consider it as impossible.
Yes it's impossible. It'd require almost every adult male to be a participant
when we know from parafeel's own figures they have only 10k registered players,
still a shortfall of 1 million participants.
Xman wrote:
This IMO this not enough because often developing countries do not follow the same behavioral trends as developed countries, because as you rightly said, they have less to do.
Why are you introducing this "logic" ? feeling guilty perhaps?

Behavoural trends.
When kids stopped being forced to do something - they usually do stop.
The older kids get the less they play sport. (Drastically in Western societies)
You suggest they have less to do.
I suggest that the 85% of PNG living in poverty would be trying to scratch out a living not playing games.
Nice try Cos.
User avatar
cos789
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3284
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL th

Post by cos789 »

The crux of this matter is what a rl "official" said. Was his name "O'Neil" by any chance ?
Nice try Cos.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 85 guests