WHAT??
PNG Population: 6,187,591
Land mass: 178,703 sq miles
Nauru Population: 9,322
Land mass: 8.1 sq miles
How can one possible make a comparison here and be relevant? Seriously! Anyway, RL has a much longer laundry list of lying that AFL has ever had. We only have to see how many times we've caught the RL out, and the number of times AFL has been caught out can be counted on one hand.
BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL than..
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL th
The comparison is not the size but the level of development, infrastructure, poverty etc....NSWAFL wrote:WHAT??
PNG Population: 6,187,591
Land mass: 178,703 sq miles
Nauru Population: 9,322
Land mass: 8.1 sq miles
How can one possible make a comparison here and be relevant? Seriously! Anyway, RL has a much longer laundry list of lying that AFL has ever had. We only have to see how many times we've caught the RL out, and the number of times AFL has been caught out can be counted on one hand.
Once we start discounting code officials without proof we are heading down a very slippery slope.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL th
No it's not.Xman wrote:Nauru is a good example .
Nauru is a close knit island community.
85% of PNG live in rural poverty and rugged isolation.
He gave a definition of "participants" that's different to what we use.Xman wrote:I'm not sure how we can insist others believe every comment from the AFL if we then refuse to believe comments from RL officials.
Yes it's impossible. It'd require almost every adult male to be a participantXman wrote:There was no proof to the contrary just a plea to consider it as impossible.
when we know from parafeel's own figures they have only 10k registered players,
still a shortfall of 1 million participants.
Why are you introducing this "logic" ? feeling guilty perhaps?Xman wrote:This IMO this not enough because often developing countries do not follow the same behavioral trends as developed countries, because as you rightly said, they have less to do.
Behavoural trends.
When kids stopped being forced to do something - they usually do stop.
The older kids get the less they play sport. (Drastically in Western societies)
You suggest they have less to do.
I suggest that the 85% of PNG living in poverty would be trying to scratch out a living not playing games.
Nice try Cos.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: BS file claim#16: more participants in PNG playing RL th
The crux of this matter is what a rl "official" said. Was his name "O'Neil" by any chance ?
Nice try Cos.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 85 guests