Page 1 of 3

Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:35 pm
by cos789
Image

They still have got a sense of humour.............................. but no sponsor.

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:51 pm
by NSWAFL
That's a Brumby isn't it? :mrgreen:

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:08 pm
by Beaussie
Brumbies own the ACT.

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:47 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Prove it Bea, crowds sponsors, juniors TV ratings and so on.

RL owns the ACT.

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:27 pm
by NSWAFL
How can they when they don't have a sponsor, Debbie?

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:36 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Either do the Brumbies fluffer.

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:40 pm
by NSWAFL

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:52 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Brumbies own the ACT.

brumbies own nothing ......... I mean 8-[ .. litterally :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:04 am
by Raiderdave

all minor partners
the Raiders have this many too

neither have a " major " sponsor for 2012 at this stage ...

the Raiders can afford to have this linger for a while
they have had offers ... but they haven't been enough , the Raiders have put a price on being a major sponsor they don't need to budge from because they are so secure an organisation away from football

the brumbies have had no such offers
& have no .... non football operation support ... like the Raiders
they are in huge strife ........

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:07 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
So Bea, you going to prove the Brumbies own the ACT?

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:33 pm
by NSWAFL
Raiderdave wrote:

all minor partners
the Raiders have this many too

neither have a " major " sponsor for 2012 at this stage ...

the Raiders can afford to have this linger for a while
they have had offers ... but they haven't been enough , the Raiders have put a price on being a major sponsor they don't need to budge from because they are so secure an organisation away from football

the brumbies have had no such offers
& have no .... non football operation support ... like the Raiders
they are in huge strife ........
You prove they have sponsors, Dave. The Raiders are in bigger trouble than the Brumbies.

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:40 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
How are they when the Raiders have at least 3 Leagues clubs backing them?

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:04 pm
by NSWAFL
Lower attendanances than the Brumbies for a start!

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:13 pm
by Raiderdave
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
How are they when the Raiders have at least 3 Leagues clubs backing them?

they own 10 clubs parra

all turning profits
guess where that goes ............... :wink:

Re: Good news for the Raiders

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:21 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

all minor partners
the Raiders have this many too

neither have a " major " sponsor for 2012 at this stage ...

the Raiders can afford to have this linger for a while
they have had offers ... but they haven't been enough , the Raiders have put a price on being a major sponsor they don't need to budge from because they are so secure an organisation away from football

the brumbies have had no such offers
& have no .... non football operation support ... like the Raiders
they are in huge strife ........
You prove they have sponsors, Dave. The Raiders are in bigger trouble than the Brumbies.

you are now officially .. the biggest F.uckwit on this site
the Canberra Raiders partners directory for 2012
with all ..... 100 plus.. minor sponsors for this year

http://www.raiders.com.au/default.aspx? ... -directory

choke on that you knob :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: