Page 648 of 852

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 8:19 pm
by pussycat
NRL at the very least 800k

Metro + gem = 300
Reg. 200
PTV: 300

And 'the kicker no NewZealand ratings for any match.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:09 am
by Fred
pussycat wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:39 pm
The_Wookie wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:32 pm
Terry wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:55 pm



Dunno Freddy........maybe he's comparing pay tv numbers! Just a thought.
Shit that doesnt work for us when it comes to not having Origin though. Just a thought.
You had PTV games at that time didnt you?

But if you want to compare ratings - compare them all. It would be like an AFL person comparing Metro only - or any other subsector only - which RL folk say doesn't give the full picture - particularly when a recent post by Leroy or Terry states that subscriptions for Fox are far greater in NSW and QLD.

Surely over all ratings is the guide you want. I mean sure - if you want to break it down into subsets - that can be done in all manner of ways - but then you would complain and but but bit like you do so often.

It looks a bit pathetic and desperate to be honest.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:39 am
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 8:19 pm
NRL at the very least 800k

Metro + gem = 300
Reg. 200
PTV: 300

And 'the kicker no NewZealand ratings for any match.
You lost so you just made up your own figures

Lol

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:42 am
by pussycat
These matches must of been shown concurrently :

1 LIVE: AFL ST KILDA V GEELONG FOX FOOTY
229,000
2 LIVE: AFL FREMANTLE V HAWTHORN FOX FOOTY
163,000

:(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:04 pm
by Terry
The_Wookie wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:32 pm
Terry wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:55 pm
Fred wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 1:48 pm


Why do you only post pay tv ?

Dunno Freddy........maybe he's comparing pay tv numbers! Just a thought.
Shit that doesnt work for us when it comes to not having Origin though. Just a thought.
Whatch ya talkin' about Wookster?? Are you cranky you haven't got a product to put up against SOO?? I mean.......ya used to but it tanked remember?

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:06 pm
by pussycat
Fred wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:09 am
pussycat wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:39 pm
The_Wookie wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:32 pm


Shit that doesnt work for us when it comes to not having Origin though. Just a thought.
You had PTV games at that time didnt you?

But if you want to compare ratings - compare them all. It would be like an AFL person comparing Metro only - or any other subsector only - which RL folk say doesn't give the full picture - particularly when a recent post by Leroy or Terry states that subscriptions for Fox are far greater in NSW and QLD.

Surely over all ratings is the guide you want. I mean sure - if you want to break it down into subsets - that can be done in all manner of ways - but then you would complain and but but bit like you do so often.

It looks a bit pathetic and desperate to be honest.
'Subsciption are greater' Fred . More subscribers because more people take out subscriptions eg. they like there football more! :rock:

If I was to tell you Fred we get 3millioon for Origin your usual response is, " Not Fair, Not Fair, Not Fair we have'nt got that, whinge, whine, whine, head to head . But when like for like is compared , you go off on a rant about something else.

Born Wingers - another Victorian trait!

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 4:49 pm
by Fred
but it is not like for like - you are wanting a ratings comparison but using only one little select ratings platform. If you want to compare rating compare the whole thing.

As mentioned - numerous times by numerous others - ratings on fox are not the be all and end all. More people in NSW and QLD have fox - therefore it is only natural that RL, the dominant sport in NSW and QLD - rates better on fox. The only thing you can argue is that on fox - RL games have better ratings. That's like someone saying AFL rates better in Melbourne ..... and!!!!

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:20 pm
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:06 pm


'Subsciption are greater' Fred . More subscribers because more people take out subscriptions eg. they like there football more! :rock:
or they dont need to pay foxtel to watch their team play every week :wave:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:16 pm
by pussycat
NlolRL wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:20 pm
pussycat wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:06 pm


'Subsciption are greater' Fred . More subscribers because more people take out subscriptions eg. they like there football more! :rock:
or they dont need to pay foxtel to watch their team play every week :wave:
Oh ! you mean someone like Brisbane, the NRL's most popular team who are on TV 75 or 80% of the time! Or do you mean somebody like NZ who gets zero ratings from PTV!

But, But, But There's always an excuse with you place getters!

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:33 am
by pussycat
I't wasnt that many but, buts back that Lol's was trying to make out that AFL was being held back by overlapping matches and poor times slots. Now there all shown seperately and in prime time and nothing much has changed.

LIVE: AFL ADELAIDE V COLLINGTON FOX FOOTY
203,000

:blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah: :rock:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:01 pm
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:16 pm
NlolRL wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:20 pm
pussycat wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:06 pm


'Subsciption are greater' Fred . More subscribers because more people take out subscriptions eg. they like there football more! :rock:
or they dont need to pay foxtel to watch their team play every week :wave:
Oh ! you mean someone like Brisbane, the NRL's most popular team who are on TV 75 or 80% of the time! Or do you mean somebody like NZ who gets zero ratings from PTV!

But, But, But There's always an excuse with you place getters!
Brisbane are 1 of 3 teams in qld.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:03 pm
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:33 am
I't wasnt that many but, buts back that Lol's was trying to make out that AFL was being held back by overlapping matches and poor times slots. Now there all shown seperately and in prime time and nothing much has changed.

LIVE: AFL ADELAIDE V COLLINGTON FOX FOOTY
203,000

:blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah: :rock:
Really? The AFL wasn't averaging 200k per match for concurrent games, far from it. So yes, I proves my point nicely

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:32 pm
by pussycat
That was a Colligton Match LOL. You know, AFL's best rating team. Not average rating team. Not Free v Hawth 160 , Melb. v Nth Melb. 180

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 5:48 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
NlolRL wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:03 pm
pussycat wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:33 am
I't wasnt that many but, buts back that Lol's was trying to make out that AFL was being held back by overlapping matches and poor times slots. Now there all shown seperately and in prime time and nothing much has changed.

LIVE: AFL ADELAIDE V COLLINGTON FOX FOOTY
203,000

:blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah: :rock:
Really? The AFL wasn't averaging 200k per match for concurrent games, far from it. So yes, I proves my point nicely
proves no point, AFL games are being shown in PRIMETIME like never before.
and be lucky to be getting a 200 AVG. all this with MEXICO in lockdown.

wonder what the games would be if they were in the afternoon and not Primetime every night

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:00 pm
by NlolRL
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2020 5:48 pm
NlolRL wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:03 pm
pussycat wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:33 am
I't wasnt that many but, buts back that Lol's was trying to make out that AFL was being held back by overlapping matches and poor times slots. Now there all shown seperately and in prime time and nothing much has changed.

LIVE: AFL ADELAIDE V COLLINGTON FOX FOOTY
203,000

:blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah: :rock:
Really? The AFL wasn't averaging 200k per match for concurrent games, far from it. So yes, I proves my point nicely
proves no point, AFL games are being shown in PRIMETIME like never before.
and be lucky to be getting a 200 AVG. all this with MEXICO in lockdown.

wonder what the games would be if they were in the afternoon and not Primetime every night
yeah nah. It proves games shown in isolation rate higher on PTV than concurrent games