Talking Footy

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 6:42 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 6:29 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 12:00 pm

How's this pal??? After Melbourne went into lockdown the overall TV ratings went up around 10-15% immediately. I suspect they've gone up more since mid July and will undoubtedly go up more again now dictator Dan has gone all Police State.

I suspect you will now revert to head in the sand deny, deny, deny!!!!!

Over to you pal!!!!!!!

https://tvtonight.com.au/2020/07/is-mel ... kdown.html

nice work Terry

So 10% of Melbourne's average 350k rating is 35k.

Good on ya pal.........right on cue..........idiocy lololol!!!!!!! You ask for proof supported by figures. I understand you don't have the wherewithal to do a very very complicated thing like a google search lololololol!!!!!!!!!! So I do it for ya and supply the figures & proof..........So.......now what's the matter pal??????

It's deadset like dealing with a 10 year old kid!!!! Never happy! Always tantrums!! Can't do anything for themselves. What else can I help with ya with pal? Join the dots? Paint by numbers? Organise a treasure hunt?? SSSShhhhhhheeeeeessssshshhhhhhhhh!!!!!

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:01 pm

Fred wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:16 pm

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 11:43 am

NRL: STORM V KNIGHTS FOX LEAGUE 265,000 (4pm) [gold]
AFL FREMANTLE V COLLINGWOOD FOX FOOTY 228,000 (6.10pm) [silver]

NRL DOGS v EELS FOX LEAGUE 181,000 (2pm) [gold]
AFL GOLD COAST V GWS FOX FOOTY 152,000 (3.35pm) [silver]

NrL = 446k
AFL = 380k

But, But, But But, But, But But, But, But And the dance goes on

Why do you selectively on report fox ratings? Well I know why - but just pointing this out.

Talk about desperate lol.... but but but -


Do we have the overall figures of people watching.

How the fark are these serlective????


No i dont . But overall they would have favoured the AFL. Because the AFL had 5 FTA games and the NRL had3 , AFL 9 PTV games the NRL 8.

All matches were shown in isolation this week and scheduling was similar . So those myths are

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:29 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 6:42 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 6:29 pm

nice work Terry

So 10% of Melbourne's average 350k rating is 35k.

Good on ya pal.........right on cue..........idiocy lololol!!!!!!! You ask for proof supported by figures. I understand you don't have the wherewithal to do a very very complicated thing like a google search lololololol!!!!!!!!!! So I do it for ya and supply the figures & proof..........So.......now what's the matter pal??????

It's deadset like dealing with a 10 year old kid!!!! Never happy! Always tantrums!! Can't do anything for themselves. What else can I help with ya with pal? Join the dots? Paint by numbers? Organise a treasure hunt?? SSSShhhhhhheeeeeessssshshhhhhhhhh!!!!!

So you dont think we are allowed to ask someone who makes a claim to prove it?

Good to know. Thanks

leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:40 pm

Fred wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:16 pm

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 11:43 am

NRL: STORM V KNIGHTS FOX LEAGUE 265,000 (4pm) [gold]
AFL FREMANTLE V COLLINGWOOD FOX FOOTY 228,000 (6.10pm) [silver]

NRL DOGS v EELS FOX LEAGUE 181,000 (2pm) [gold]
AFL GOLD COAST V GWS FOX FOOTY 152,000 (3.35pm) [silver]

NrL = 446k
AFL = 380k

But, But, But But, But, But But, But, But And the dance goes on

Why do you selectively on report fox ratings? Well I know why - but just pointing this out.

Talk about desperate lol.... but but but -


Do we have the overall figures of people watching.

it's not desperate.
its fox game vs a fox game...
Pussy keeps shoving it up the Murdoch's throat
again why did you pay the AFL more ?

FTA deals between the codes are drastically different.

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:01 pm

Fred wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:16 pm

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 11:43 am

NRL: STORM V KNIGHTS FOX LEAGUE 265,000 (4pm) [gold]
AFL FREMANTLE V COLLINGWOOD FOX FOOTY 228,000 (6.10pm) [silver]

NRL DOGS v EELS FOX LEAGUE 181,000 (2pm) [gold]
AFL GOLD COAST V GWS FOX FOOTY 152,000 (3.35pm) [silver]

NrL = 446k
AFL = 380k

But, But, But But, But, But But, But, But And the dance goes on

Why do you selectively on report fox ratings? Well I know why - but just pointing this out.

Talk about desperate lol.... but but but -


Do we have the overall figures of people watching.

How the fark are these serlective????


No i dont . But overall they would have favoured the AFL. Because the AFL had 5 FTA games and the NRL had3 , AFL 9 PTV games the NRL 8.

All matches were shown in isolation this week and scheduling was similar . So those myths are

Fred wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:53 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:40 pm

Fred wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:16 pm

Why do you selectively on report fox ratings? Well I know why - but just pointing this out.

Talk about desperate lol.... but but but -


Do we have the overall figures of people watching.

it's not desperate.
its fox game vs a fox game...
Pussy keeps shoving it up the Murdoch's throat
again why did you pay the AFL more ?

FTA deals between the codes are drastically different.

I think it is desperate. Obviously there is more to what they paid above that is ratings. Not rocket science. What that is I don’t know for sure but an educated guess may be.

1. AFL may have better rating shows around it.

2. AFL provides more content hours.

3. AFL may have a broader demographic

4. AFL may be seen as attracting the desired demographic

5. AFL may have a broader National reach.

6. AFL subscribers, for whatever reason, may be worth more. Maybe the bit larger packages for example when they do commit.


Whatever the reason, one of the most astute businessmen in the world, particularly in the media industry, felt it was worth paying what he did. Not for me to second guess his reason.

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:46 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:29 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 6:42 pm

Good on ya pal.........right on cue..........idiocy lololol!!!!!!! You ask for proof supported by figures. I understand you don't have the wherewithal to do a very very complicated thing like a google search lololololol!!!!!!!!!! So I do it for ya and supply the figures & proof..........So.......now what's the matter pal??????

It's deadset like dealing with a 10 year old kid!!!! Never happy! Always tantrums!! Can't do anything for themselves. What else can I help with ya with pal? Join the dots? Paint by numbers? Organise a treasure hunt?? SSSShhhhhhheeeeeessssshshhhhhhhhh!!!!!

So you dont think we are allowed to ask someone who makes a claim to prove it?

Good to know. Thanks

Geez pal, it sure is hard to get through to you!!!!! You asked.........I then provided proof of said claim. You came back with some incoherent idiocy that Bletchley Park wouldn't be able to decipher.

So.............read this slowly pal.................Yes, you can ask for proof. But when you are given said proof you should comment on it rather than rant in-comprehensibly. Shheesshhhh!!!! It's like teaching remedial 4th class english lololololol!!!!!!!!!!!

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:07 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:46 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:29 pm

So you dont think we are allowed to ask someone who makes a claim to prove it?

Good to know. Thanks

Geez pal, it sure is hard to get through to you!!!!! You asked.........I then provided proof of said claim. You came back with some incoherent idiocy that Bletchley Park wouldn't be able to decipher.

So.............read this slowly pal.................Yes, you can ask for proof. But when you are given said proof you should comment on it rather than rant in-comprehensibly. Shheesshhhh!!!! It's like teaching remedial 4th class english lololololol!!!!!!!!!!!

I said well done Terry for finding evidence, then noted the percentage increase would be pretty small in the greater scheme of things. If you cant understand that how am I to blame? :[]

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:19 pm

And the proof I provided was only a couple of days after the level 3 lockdown. I suspect the increase is now much more. And now with Dictator Dan closing the joint down completely they'll go up again.

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:27 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:19 pm

And the proof I provided was only a couple of days after the level 3 lockdown. I suspect the increase is now much more. And now with Dictator Dan closing the joint down completely they'll go up again.

got any proof of this?

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:03 pm

Fred wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:53 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:40 pm

it's not desperate.
its fox game vs a fox game...
Pussy keeps shoving it up the Murdoch's throat
again why did you pay the AFL more ?

FTA deals between the codes are drastically different.

I think it is desperate. Obviously there is more to what they paid above that is ratings. Not rocket science. What that is I don’t know for sure but an educated guess may be.

1. AFL may have better rating shows around it.

2. AFL provides more content hours.

3. AFL may have a broader demographic

4. AFL may be seen as attracting the desired demographic

5. AFL may have a broader National reach.

6. AFL subscribers, for whatever reason, may be worth more. Maybe the bit larger packages for example when they do commit.


Whatever the reason, one of the most astute businessmen in the world, particularly in the media industry, felt it was worth paying what he did. Not for me to second guess his reason.

Freddo:

1. Wrong!
2. Wrong!
3. Wrong!
4. Wrong!
5. Wrong!
6 Wrong!

Rupie paid more last deal because he was pissed off Dave Smith gave preference to ch 9 with 4 FTA games per week. Doubling the previous FTA games on 9. Rupie had to pay Nine to buy the Saturday game off 'em. He weren't a happy media mogul!!!!!

It pissed him off so much he paid overs for the fumbling mess as an up you to Smith. Facts are always a handy instrument Freddo. They kinda beat an educated guess every time lololololololol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fred wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:03 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:03 pm

Fred wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:53 pm

I think it is desperate. Obviously there is more to what they paid above that is ratings. Not rocket science. What that is I don’t know for sure but an educated guess may be.

1. AFL may have better rating shows around it.

2. AFL provides more content hours.

3. AFL may have a broader demographic

4. AFL may be seen as attracting the desired demographic

5. AFL may have a broader National reach.

6. AFL subscribers, for whatever reason, may be worth more. Maybe the bit larger packages for example when they do commit.


Whatever the reason, one of the most astute businessmen in the world, particularly in the media industry, felt it was worth paying what he did. Not for me to second guess his reason.

Freddo:

1. Wrong!
2. Wrong!
3. Wrong!
4. Wrong!
5. Wrong!
6 Wrong!

Rupie paid more last deal because he was pissed off Dave Smith gave preference to ch 9 with 4 FTA games per week. Doubling the previous FTA games on 9. Rupie had to pay Nine to buy the Saturday game off 'em. He weren't a happy media mogul!!!!!

It pissed him off so much he paid overs for the fumbling mess as an up you to Smith. Facts are always a handy instrument Freddo. They kinda beat an educated guess every time lololololololol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Firstly.... who are you to say I am wrong? Seriously... stay in your lane. You saying it is wrong does not make it so. Don’t confuse opinion with fact.

Secondly.... what I have postulated is simply possibilities .... not facts. Learn to read. Reasons why they may have paid more.

Thirdly.... you think one of the worlds top media moguls does deals on grievances ...... stupid stupid statement.


Fourthly.... you should know better than to challenge me. I’ll let you off normally and going light on you here.... but know your limits and your station in life PAL .....

Fred wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:58 pm

No point just reporting fox. Need fta as well.