It's not too difficult, I think crapper got it.King-Eliagh wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2019 8:11 pm
Cats me boy? Have you had a few beers or what? You’re speaking complete gobbledygook
Look I know the news and evidence I bring is upsetting. But jeez I didn’t expect it to totally disorient you folk of all mental capacity
I agree with one thing you suggested. more crowd numbers = more potential for incident.
Hence why I adjusted the 18-3 score ie 6 times the likelihood of a scumbag to a very afl generous result of 3 times the likelihood of scumbag of the earth types after adjusting that afl crowds are on avg a bit less than double the size.
Do you comprehend sport ol chap? I know it’s upsetting but think back to year five mathematics and you might just realise the truth.
And if you can’t? Well like I said to that slob nlol, provide some evidence to prove your points or, ever so kindly, piiiiisssss on orrrrrrrfff outta my thread. I want proper debate here not rancid individual fake news slobber in my thread dammit!!
Purely using math, as you did.
Afl 30kave - 18
Nrl 15kave - 3
18÷3 = 6
That suggests to equal the AFL's scumbag efforts of 18, the NRL wouldn't have got there unless they had 6 times the crowd ave.
6x15 = 90k.
I dare say the per capita ratio would've spiked significantly for the NRL if there were 90k at every game.
Do you comprehend ol' Puss? Math doesn't seem to be your strong suit.