Well ill wait for his spam fest in the wee hours to see how he goes, and a lot of those threads will be locked otherwise. I'm glad TFC has gone back to this policy. Maybe it could go further and close other bs like threads about cities etc which have no football merit. WTF you waited for so long to...

did you forget to shut this one down too?

So, let's talk about "nrl unheard of in most countries"

There was evidence you chose to ignore it. There's a difference.

HTF can I be wrong all the time when you when I've been right.

It could mean something.
You just quoted some sponsorships that have changed.
It has more relevance than what constitutes an ugly city.

The_Wookie wrote:

you are the spammer here. How the fuck dont you see that.

HTF can requesting that people stay on topic be spamming??

HTF can you ignore crapper's spamming???

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Yes they do .

Can you prove that?

Well ill wait for his spam fest in the wee hours to see how he goes, and a lot of those threads will be locked otherwise. I'm glad TFC has gone back to this policy. Maybe it could go further and close other bs like threads about cities etc which have no football merit. WTF you waited for so long to...

Clearly NZ has some interest in AFL - AFL games, AFL on TV, local leagues and clubs plus a very large Auskick program

so lets see the proof behind this ridiculous thread claim.

Another website ruined by wookie features Another website ruined by wookie features Another website ruined by wookie features Another website ruined by wookie features Another website ruined by wookie features Another website ruined by wookie features Another website ruined by wookie features Anothe...

It's even more impressive when sponsors change camp IMO. you wrote this. Despite this never happening. You took it off topic. No one else. You did. Err, the implications of the new sponsor is/ should be relevant don't you think. Also it was was qualified by "IMO" and I should have used &q...

So in your opinion NZ and Wales don't really count.
Obviousy the wc was under threat - just a question of how much.
You're saying not really.
That's the way it turned out but at the time there was serious concerns.

Most neutral fans would be of the opinion that Essendon haven't done much technically wrong but they should have never gone down that path. Also most fans would be of the opinion that if you haven't got a strong case for a quick decision then don't proceed until you do. I suspect your vastly out of...

can we have some proof on this thread .