Page 10 of 10
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:46 am
by SportCapital
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:18 am
Lol I'll,explain it in simple terms .you still will have massive troubles .
For every 100 people at a fumble game approx 41 are female
For every 100 people at an NRL game approx 37.5 are female .
Now according to you 41 is close to 50
Yet 37.5 doesn't come close to 41.
In vicderpian education ....3.5 or 4 is far bigger than 9
Put your helmet back on next time you ride a bike .
Although I suspect the damage has already been done .
You are next level stupid!
You really struggle with percentages.
41.38 is close.
37.5 is not close.
So my statement is accurate relative to 50/50
37.5 is not close to 41.38 because it requires a 10.35% increase.
Greater than 10% is not close.
So my statement is also accurate relative to the percentages of women at our games.
I don't think I can dumb it down anymore than that.
Please take some time to comprehend the equations.
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:40 am
by Terry
SportCapital wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:46 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:18 am
Lol I'll,explain it in simple terms .you still will have massive troubles .
For every 100 people at a fumble game approx 41 are female
For every 100 people at an NRL game approx 37.5 are female .
Now according to you 41 is close to 50
Yet 37.5 doesn't come close to 41.
In vicderpian education ....3.5 or 4 is far bigger than 9
Put your helmet back on next time you ride a bike .
Although I suspect the damage has already been done .
You are next level stupid!
You really struggle with percentages.
41.38 is close.
37.5 is not close.
So my statement is accurate relative to 50/50
37.5 is not close to 41.38 because it requires a 10.35% increase.
Greater than 10% is not close.
So my statement is also accurate relative to the percentages of women at our games.
I don't think I can dumb it down anymore than that.
Please take some time to comprehend the equations.
Wow impressive stuff!!!! Did you previously work for Kim Jong Il in the progaganda department???? Hilarious!!!! No wonder everyone outside the bubble laughs at any figures put out by your dear leader at fumblehouse lololololololololololol.
By the way: Did anyone ever find those 'thousands' of locals hiding under the stands at last years game in China???????
Lolololoololololololololol.
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 12:52 pm
by SportCapital
See crap, even Terry can appreciate the logic.
And he's not easily impressed.
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 7:55 pm
by AFLcrap1
SportCapital wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:46 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:18 am
Lol I'll,explain it in simple terms .you still will have massive troubles .
For every 100 people at a fumble game approx 41 are female
For every 100 people at an NRL game approx 37.5 are female .
Now according to you 41 is close to 50
Yet 37.5 doesn't come close to 41.
In vicderpian education ....3.5 or 4 is far bigger than 9
Put your helmet back on next time you ride a bike .
Although I suspect the damage has already been done .
You are next level stupid!
You really struggle with percentages.
41.38 is close.
37.5 is not close.
So my statement is accurate relative to 50/50
37.5 is not close to 41.38 because it requires a 10.35% increase.
Greater than 10% is not close.
So my statement is also accurate relative to the percentages of women at our games.
I don't think I can dumb it down anymore than that.
Please take some time to comprehend the equations.
Oh dear .
I simplified it for you & you still can't see it .
Oh well I tried l
You get 1 point for being unco & missing
But heres a little brain teaser for you .using your logic .
My bet is you still won't get it .
What percentage increase does the afl need to get to 50/50
Much larger than 10
Let's say about 20%
SO now using your fucked up logic 10% is more than 20%.
I think it's time for the medics
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:25 pm
by Terry
There is no point conversing with these dills. Case in point: Sportcrapital believes 41 is close to 50 but 37 is not close to 41????? Lololololololololololololoolol. His remedial maths teacher deadest failed with this dullard!!
These fumblers are so delusional they are beyond help.
Yep. Medic?????? Medic????