Page 1 of 4
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 10:46 am
by Terry
The figures are pretty much what you expect for the AFL, RL and cricket. The interesting parts are that the FFA's revenue is -36.5% - that's gotta be a worry - the ARU doesn't make the list - and Penrith RL is the biggest football club in the country with revenue a whopping 59 mill more than second placed Collingwood.
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 10:47 am
by sydneyfc
FFAil
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 10:49 am
by pussycat
The soccer has had a big fall. Whats the problem there?
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 10:52 am
by Terry
The Penrith story is amazing. They alone made more than the FFA and the ARU!!!!!
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:05 am
by Fred
It's interesting that Penrith is classed as accomodation and food services whilst the other sports are classed as Arts and Recreation. Does this reflect the primary source of income/type of business. No doubting Penrith is a massive business and money making machine and a great model in supporting financially the football club. No wonder some afl clubs have tried to go down this route as a stream of revenue.
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:55 pm
by leagueiscrap
Fred wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:05 am
It's interesting that Penrith is classed as accomodation and food services whilst the other sports are classed as Arts and Recreation. Does this reflect the primary source of income/type of business. No doubting Penrith is a massive business and money making machine and a great model in supporting financially the football club. No wonder some afl clubs have tried to go down this route as a steam of revenue.
the only reason why penrith is listed is because of their mini casino,that was brought with Jame Packers money thanks to Phill Gould
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... ec3cf34347
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... a78b211280
the NRL club is a relevant worthless piece of crap
- panthers.jpg (87.94 KiB) Viewed 2101 times
http://footyindustry.com/files/2014%20R ... Report.pdf
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:56 pm
by leagueiscrap
Terry wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 10:52 am
The Penrith story is amazing. They alone made more than the FFA and the ARU!!!!!
lol why because Goulds mate Jim Packer loaned him some money to built a mini casino leagues club
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:22 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
Panthers was still massive before packer>> they just expanded since onwards
lol you and your mini casinos>>
your like a broken record
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:25 pm
by NlolRL
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:22 pm
Panthers was still massive before packer>> they just expanded since onwards
lol you and your mini casinos>>
your like a broken record
Massive? In which way? Their attendances and memberships say otherwise
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:29 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
Panthers & Parra are only going to get bigger>>
for Sydney's ever growing WEST
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:30 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:25 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:22 pm
Panthers was still massive before packer>> they just expanded since onwards
lol you and your mini casinos>>
your like a broken record
Massive? In which way? Their attendances and memberships say otherwise
I'm not talking about attendances or memberships>>
I'm talking as a Business>>>
Panthers play out of 20k stadium>> how big do you want them to get.
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:33 pm
by NlolRL
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:30 pm
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:25 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:22 pm
Panthers was still massive before packer>> they just expanded since onwards
lol you and your mini casinos>>
your like a broken record
Massive? In which way? Their attendances and memberships say otherwise
I'm not talking about attendances or memberships>>
I'm talking as a Business>>>
Panthers play out of 20k stadium>> how big do you want them to get.
Well looking at AFL clubs, the one's that I would describe as 'Massive' are healthy in every area, finances, sponsorship, fans, members, and crowds. If the Panthers have a successful business model but struggle to attract support I wouldnt call that massive
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:07 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:33 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:30 pm
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:25 pm
Massive? In which way? Their attendances and memberships say otherwise
I'm not talking about attendances or memberships>>
I'm talking as a Business>>>
Panthers play out of 20k stadium>> how big do you want them to get.
Well looking at AFL clubs, the one's that I would describe as 'Massive' are healthy in every area, finances, sponsorship, fans, members, and crowds. If the Panthers have a successful business model but struggle to attract support I wouldnt call that massive
when I described MASSIVE I was referring to LIC's info regarding Packer and Panthers>>
Panthers were massive (not footy club but the Business holdings they have)
and no they are not the biggest footy brand in Sydney
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:20 pm
by pussycat
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:33 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:30 pm
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:25 pm
Massive? In which way? Their attendances and memberships say otherwise
I'm not talking about attendances or memberships>>
I'm talking as a Business>>>
Panthers play out of 20k stadium>> how big do you want them to get.
Well looking at AFL clubs, the one's that I would describe as 'Massive' are healthy in every area, finances, sponsorship, fans, members, and crowds. If the Panthers have a successful business model but struggle to attract support I wouldnt call that massive
AFL, Perfect in every way
You mean after the $80m in handouts and $50m in loans
.
Re: Top 500 Private Companies List - AFL 78, NRL 146, CA 172....FFA 440.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:27 pm
by Terry
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:25 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:22 pm
Panthers was still massive before packer>> they just expanded since onwards
lol you and your mini casinos>>
your like a broken record
Massive? In which way? Their attendances and memberships say otherwise
Gee pal do you ever stick to the point of a thread. It's about company revenue. Penrith had 60 mill more than the second club Collingwood. That's an astounding result. Attendances and membership are the subject of other threads. Go over there if you want to bring them up.