Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:34 pm

Yep it's bizarre that as you are showing someone the door for inappropriate behaviour you are talking them up .& letting it be known they'll get another chance

Wink wink .....

From that statement by Gill the dill it's clear to me that this is all a PR exercise .

Now I might be a long way off course but I'd guess it went something like this .

Um we got to be seen to be doing something.
Yes I know we are mates ..& I will look after you ..but at the moment we have to be seen to be doing the right thing ...keep up the old RESPECT FOR WOMEN image .

Look I'll let it slip in the media that you are good people & you'll get another chance .

Lay low for awhile then we will welcome you back into the cult & you can act all remorseful....tell how you learnt how to respect. Blah blah blah .

We will get the media as usual to put a positive spin on it ......show what a great bunch we are .

NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:32 am

Hird was never charged by ASADA or WADA, so where's the issue?

At least Essendon suffered a proper punishment, unlike the sharks who went on to win the GF shortly after their token ban

Terry wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:31 am

NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:32 am

Hird was never charged by ASADA or WADA, so where's the issue?

At least Essendon suffered a proper punishment, unlike the sharks who went on to win the GF shortly after their token ban

Oh dear. So do you believe Hird was in any way responsible for what happened at Essendon??? And do you answer any question without mentioning RL?? One word answers will suffice.

NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:43 am

Terry wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:31 am

NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:32 am

Hird was never charged by ASADA or WADA, so where's the issue?

At least Essendon suffered a proper punishment, unlike the sharks who went on to win the GF shortly after their token ban

Oh dear. So do you believe Hird was in any way responsible for what happened at Essendon??? And do you answer any question without mentioning RL?? One word answers will suffice.

ASADA charged Dank, not Hird. They obviously believed Dank was the perpetrator, otherwise they would have charged and banned other like Hird.

Terry wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:54 am

NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:43 am

Terry wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:31 am

Oh dear. So do you believe Hird was in any way responsible for what happened at Essendon??? And do you answer any question without mentioning RL?? One word answers will suffice.

ASADA charged Dank, not Hird. They obviously believed Dank was the perpetrator, otherwise they would have charged and banned other like Hird.

This my friends is exhibit A - the bubble dwelling fumbling zealot. Hearing no evil, speaking no evil, seeing no evil at every turn. It is a sad indictment that in todays modern world a Melbourne suburban centric little sport can do this to people.

So there ya have it - James Hird is innocent. Nothing to see here, move on. Oh dear!!!!!!!

NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:09 am

Terry wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:54 am

NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:43 am

ASADA charged Dank, not Hird. They obviously believed Dank was the perpetrator, otherwise they would have charged and banned other like Hird.

This my friends is exhibit A - the bubble dwelling fumbling zealot. Hearing no evil, speaking no evil, seeing no evil at every turn. It is a sad indictment that in todays modern world a Melbourne suburban centric little sport can do this to people.

So there ya have it - James Hird is innocent. Nothing to see here, move on. Oh dear!!!!!!!

None of us know exactly what happened, we rely on the independent governing and investigating bodies. Was he charged by ASADA or WADA, yes or no? Did ASADA charge other support staff? Yes

It's pretty clear who they blamed

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:34 pm

Yep it's bizarre that as you are showing someone the door for inappropriate behaviour you are talking them up .& letting it be known they'll get another chance

Wink wink .....

From that statement by Gill the dill it's clear to me that this is all a PR exercise .

Now I might be a long way off course but I'd guess it went something like this .

Um we got to be seen to be doing something.
Yes I know we are mates ..& I will look after you ..but at the moment we have to be seen to be doing the right thing ...keep up the old RESPECT FOR WOMEN image .

Look I'll let it slip in the media that you are good people & you'll get another chance .

Lay low for awhile then we will welcome you back into the cult & you can act all remorseful....tell how you learnt how to respect. Blah blah blah .

We will get the media as usual to put a positive spin on it ......show what a great bunch we are .

Terry wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:04 am

Well folks the response to the sacking of yet another fumblehouse official last week for sexual harassment has been met with silence by the AFL folk here. This is what you call tacit approval of their actions.

As such I expect they will be jumping with joy that recent offender Simon Lethlean has been appointed head of St. Kilda's football department today. Yep. You dead set can't make this stuff up lolololololololololololololol.

A few months after being sacked for playing indoor sports at HQ with a junior staffer he get's another top job at an AFL club - just as predicted by the great leader Silly Gilly!!!!!!!!!

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 052tj.html

Any comments fumblers? I expect you'll back this decision to the hilt and then deflect to some perceived issue in RL lolololololololoololol.

NlolRL wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:38 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:04 am

Well folks the response to the sacking of yet another fumblehouse official last week for sexual harassment has been met with silence by the AFL folk here. This is what you call tacit approval of their actions.

As such I expect they will be jumping with joy that recent offender Simon Lethlean has been appointed head of St. Kilda's football department today. Yep. You dead set can't make this stuff up lolololololololololololololol.

A few months after being sacked for playing indoor sports at HQ with a junior staffer he get's another top job at an AFL club - just as predicted by the great leader Silly Gilly!!!!!!!!!

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 052tj.html

Any comments fumblers? I expect you'll back this decision to the hilt and then deflect to some perceived issue in RL lolololololololoololol.

junior staffer..............wasnt she around 30 and willing participant in the relationship?