Re: AFL buy Etihad stadium
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Yeah. I like the south warf but docklands itself is a wind blown concrete abyss. But others may like. No real right or wrong just different opinions.
It’s booming but there is at the moment an oversupply of apartments with over inflated prices. If you look at the government future infrastructure planning thenold rail yards area known as E gate is in the works for some major development the massive up grade to the North Melbourne train station is only just the beginning of itSwans4ever wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2016 11:16 amFred I think your wrong docklands is actually one of the booming areas of Melb and is still growing that's why the council they wanted to buy Edihad and tear it down to build more apartmentsFred wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:you getting your grounds mixed up, how is a trip to etihad any colder than the MCG. on a cold winters night its awsome with the roof on
No ... Don't like it. The whole of dock lands is a wind blown waste land imo
Given the fact your shitty little code keeps getting rejected for a bank loan to pay its basic bills!Terry wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:38 pmWell who woulda known - after all the usual fumblehouse propaganda the Etihad stadium deal is not quite what's it's cracked up to be lololololololoololol.!!!!!! Once again all tip and no iceberg lololololololololol.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... z6o8p.html
You gotta give to this mob - they beat Josef Goebbels in the propaganda dept. They continually tell the big lie........and the poor silly fumbling zealots just nod in unison, pat each other on the back and bow to the great god fumble lolololololololol. Dills!!!!
The_Wookie wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:18 pmTerry wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:38 pmWell who woulda known - after all the usual fumblehouse propaganda the Etihad stadium deal is not quite what's it's cracked up to be lololololololoololol.!!!!!! Once again all tip and no iceberg lololololololololol.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... z6o8p.html
You gotta give to this mob - they beat Josef Goebbels in the propaganda dept. They continually tell the big lie........and the poor silly fumbling zealots just nod in unison, pat each other on the back and bow to the great god fumble lolololololololol. Dills!!!!
No the new Etihad Stadium deal is fine. What the clubs dont want is to lose the financial crutch they've had for a decade that was designed to compensate for the original deal being shit.
In the case of the Dogs and North the compensation for their stadium deals and poor administration has been paid to them since 2002 ffs and now they are just being fucking bitches - we're talking millions a year. St Kilda isnt much better.
This is the clubs now wanting both the better deal AND the compensation payments to continue even though the deal will have them 1 million a year better off. This is NOT how its supposed to be.
The nrlol wouldn’t have! Just stamp their feet and demand it for nothing! Then cry for government funding.SportCapital wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:34 pmThe AFL could have waited and paid $1 for it.
A whole stadium for a buck.
But grand plans don't like waiting.
I know what the NRL would've done given the same situation.
You're right. They need every buck, not many to spare.leagueiscrap wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 8:23 pmThe nrlol wouldn’t have! Just stamp their feet and demand it for nothing! Then cry for government funding.SportCapital wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:34 pmThe AFL could have waited and paid $1 for it.
A whole stadium for a buck.
But grand plans don't like waiting.
I know what the NRL would've done given the same situation.
Then all the clubs would whinge that their home grounds need up dates as well with out contributing a cent