Chilean AFL greater than Chilean rl
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 5:55 pm
Yes folks!
Chilian football has come of age.
Chilian football has come of age.
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Any pics or vids to back it up?cos789 wrote:Yes folks!
Chilian football has come of age.
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>cos789 wrote:Yes folks!
Chilian football has come of age.
Except the website saying so and you denying it.AFLcrap1 wrote:There is no proof at all of playing any matches.
So a website says so.cos789 wrote:Except the website saying so and you denying it.AFLcrap1 wrote:There is no proof at all of playing any matches.
There is no point in denying AF in Chile whilst suggesting we accept rl in Kenya.
cos789 wrote:Except the website saying so and you denying it.AFLcrap1 wrote:There is no proof at all of playing any matches.
There is no point in denying AF in Chile whilst suggesting we accept rl in Kenya.
We have a website for AF in Chile. You say that you have a video for Kenya. WTF does that proove?MarkZZZ wrote:cos789 wrote:Except the website saying so and you denying it.AFLcrap1 wrote:There is no proof at all of playing any matches.
There is no point in denying AF in Chile whilst suggesting we accept rl in Kenya.
We have video evidence that there is RL in Kenya (international level) what do we have for Chilean AR? Nothing
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>cos789 wrote:We have a website for AF in Chile. You say that you have a video for Kenya. WTF does that proove?MarkZZZ wrote:cos789 wrote:Except the website saying so and you denying it.AFLcrap1 wrote:There is no proof at all of playing any matches.
There is no point in denying AF in Chile whilst suggesting we accept rl in Kenya.
We have video evidence that there is RL in Kenya (international level) what do we have for Chilean AR? Nothing
You cannot say videos are proof of rl in Kenya then dismiss videos of Australian Football as evidence.
WTF is your criteria ? criteria that can be used universally.
FFS how can you call that international - a bunch of fat Italian con tiki tourists have a scratch match and your calling it an international - but then again you don't care who plays for Australia let alone any other country - any comp that will let two countries provide players for ALL the other countries is not international competition!MarkZZZ wrote:cos789 wrote:Except the website saying so and you denying it.AFLcrap1 wrote:There is no proof at all of playing any matches.
There is no point in denying AF in Chile whilst suggesting we accept rl in Kenya.
We have video evidence that there is RL in Kenya (international level) what do we have for Chilean AR? Nothing
Swans4ever wrote:FFS how can you call that international - a bunch of fat Italian con tiki tourists have a scratch match and your calling it an international - but then again you don't care who plays for Australia let alone any other country - any comp that will let two countries provide players for ALL the other countries is not international competition!MarkZZZ wrote:cos789 wrote:Except the website saying so and you denying it.AFLcrap1 wrote:There is no proof at all of playing any matches.
There is no point in denying AF in Chile whilst suggesting we accept rl in Kenya.
We have video evidence that there is RL in Kenya (international level) what do we have for Chilean AR? Nothing
You fucking fruitloop .Just admit that the fact that RL has a legit & long international history ,eats you up..cos789 wrote:Typical rl bogan.
I love showing people the level of intelligence rl fans exhibit.
keep up the good work.