Re: Which comp is higher quality?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:19 pm
TLPG has stated that reserve grade in the CAFL is of a much higher quality than Sydney Division 5. You agreed. However TLPG also stated that you could not be playing any higher than Sydney Division 4. So his point is that because you could only play at such a low level, based on his statement that you lack knowledge of the game, it is not possible for you to get a game in the reserve grade in the CAFL when you were there.
He presents a strong argument, and you have still not provided positive proof to the contrary.
So here is the situation that I am in. On the basis of sheer proof alone, you are on an equal footing with TLPG so I do not know who to believe. So we then go to credibility and in this area, TLPG is defeating you. This is what you are unable to accept, and instead of providing countering proof you decide to abuse instead. This will not win you the argument, and until you understand this folly of yours you can expect to be treated like a petulant child by me.
Improve your credibility, and do so without abuse. Then I will listen.
He presents a strong argument, and you have still not provided positive proof to the contrary.
So here is the situation that I am in. On the basis of sheer proof alone, you are on an equal footing with TLPG so I do not know who to believe. So we then go to credibility and in this area, TLPG is defeating you. This is what you are unable to accept, and instead of providing countering proof you decide to abuse instead. This will not win you the argument, and until you understand this folly of yours you can expect to be treated like a petulant child by me.
Improve your credibility, and do so without abuse. Then I will listen.
