Page 4 of 5
Re: Does South African AR have more participants than rl.
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:42 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:RFL is not Barla sara.
And forcings back is not Australian feebleball and Newcastle has never played AFL.
You did it again! They DO play AFL! And you already lost on that challenge! No repeats!
Re: Does South African AR have more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:54 pm
by cos789
NSWAFL wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:RFL is not Barla sara.
And forcings back is not Australian feebleball and Newcastle has never played AFL.
You did it again! They DO play AFL! And you already lost on that challenge! No repeats!
Interesting point NSWAFL, parafeel should get another automatic bs point because he repeated the statement (long) after a determination has been made. I also believe there should be an
additional point for contempt !
Do it NSWAFL, do it.
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:41 pm
by cos789
Why should I bother dealing with a person who has to inflate rl test figures of things.
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:50 pm
by NSWAFL
Two more is two too many. Suspension awaits, Debbie!
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:33 pm
by cos789
I don't know why I bother dealing with a person who has to inflate rl test figures of all things.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Bahahahahaha, someones losing it
Andit seems to be you. Because..
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Senior teams Tom, don't South Africa have them?
Because I've already posted them - remember ?
Has all those excessess erased your memory ?
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:42 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:Two more is two too many. Suspension awaits, Debbie!
Wtf are you taking about with suspensions and shiit?
I haven't got a pm from anyone saying anything.
Dumbarse.
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:40 pm
by cos789
cos789 wrote:I don't know why I bother dealing with a person who has to inflate rl test figures of all things.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Bahahahahaha, someones losing it
Andit seems to be you. Because..
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Senior teams Tom, don't South Africa have them?
Because I've already posted them - remember ?
Has all those excessess erased your memory ?
I've already posted them - remember ?
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:45 pm
by NSWAFL
Can't you read, ignoramus?
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:18 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Senior teams please.
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:28 pm
by NSWAFL
Obviously Debbie can't read.
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:35 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
No senior teams huh?
Just a few kiddies playing force em back?
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:36 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:No senior teams huh?
Just a few kiddies playing force em back?
lol, forgot the wild part, force em back wild style.
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:39 pm
by NSWAFL
Go back to school and redo your comprehension class, Debbie. You need the refresher!
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:56 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
AFL, Australian forceemback League
Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:28 am
by cos789
Got anything remotely intelligent to say parafeel ?