Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Haha!

The NRL have long claimed superiority on payTV. Yet the moment AFL states actually start to get comparable subscription rates, and AFL matches are finally shown exclusively on payTV (not against FTA) they sweep in and win.

You're upset, we can see that, and so you should be. There's more of this to come, and you won't have your "but the regionals" bs to fall back on.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Haha!

The NRL have long claimed superiority on payTV. Yet the moment AFL states actually start to get comparable subscription rates, and AFL matches are finally shown exclusively on payTV (not against FTA) they sweep in and win.

You're upset, we can see that, and so you should be. There's more of this to come, and you won't have your "but the regionals" bs to fall back on.

oh my

talk about shooting yr load in yr daks ... which for you isn't uncommon & we sympathise with yr missus

but what a world of pain you & bearsy have created for yourselves if the above does not eventuate
I will give you **** from March to Sept

NSWAFL wrote:

The writing's on the wall already!

Beaussie wrote:

Again, NRL smashed by the AFL in the Pay TV ratings. Way to go AFL and nice start for Foxtel and Fox Footy. Domination I tell ya.

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Again, NRL smashed by the AFL in the Pay TV ratings. Way to go AFL and nice start for Foxtel and Fox Footy. Domination I tell ya.

scrapped to a tiny win .... once .... in 15 years


whhooo hooo

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Again, NRL smashed by the AFL in the Pay TV ratings. Way to go AFL and nice start for Foxtel and Fox Footy. Domination I tell ya.

scrapped to a tiny win .... once .... in 15 years


whhooo hooo

Yeah, the first time they've been on close to equal terms. Much more of this to come I'm afraid. Even the dodgy cumulative figures will heavily favor the AFL this year.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

scrapped to a tiny win .... once .... in 15 years


whhooo hooo

Yeah, the first time they've been on close to equal terms. Much more of this to come I'm afraid. Even the dodgy cumulative figures will heavily favor the AFL this year.

close n equal terms ?

theres 130 NRL games on pay tv to come
lets reserve the term equal for a bit longer ... shall we

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Yeah, the first time they've been on close to equal terms. Much more of this to come I'm afraid. Even the dodgy cumulative figures will heavily favor the AFL this year.

close n equal terms ?

theres 130 NRL games on pay tv to come
lets reserve the term equal for a bit longer ... shall we

Equal as in evenly counted across the country, comparable subscription rates, and neither game was shown against another FTA game.

Prince Imperial wrote:

Once again Fox Footy is easily the best rating subscription channel for the week 22/4 to 22/8. It secured 3.6% of subscription viewers placing it well ahead of Fox 8 and Fox Sports 2 both at 2.3%.

There are also some interesting figures available for total channel share in each of the 5 city metro markets. The total metropolitan viewing for all TV channels (including those who don't have pay) shows that nationally Fox Footy had 1.6% of all viewing. The city figures were Sydney (0.5), Melbourne (2.6), Brisbane (1.3), Adelaide (1.9) and Perth (2.2) . Very good result for Brisbane I would think especially given the onfield weakness of the Lions and Suns.

http://www.oztam.com.au//documents/2012 ... hrCons.pdf

Beaussie wrote:

Just came across the following over at Big Footy posted by Prince Imperial. Very impressive figures indeed for Fox Footy, in particular Brisbane. =D> =D> =D>

Prince Imperial wrote:

Once again Fox Footy is easily the best rating subscription channel for the week 22/4 to 22/8. It secured 3.6% of subscription viewers placing it well ahead of Fox 8 and Fox Sports 2 both at 2.3%.

There are also some interesting figures available for total channel share in each of the 5 city metro markets. The total metropolitan viewing for all TV channels (including those who don't have pay) shows that nationally Fox Footy had 1.6% of all viewing. The city figures were Sydney (0.5), Melbourne (2.6), Brisbane (1.3), Adelaide (1.9) and Perth (2.2) . Very good result for Brisbane I would think especially given the onfield weakness of the Lions and Suns.

http://www.oztam.com.au//documents/2012 ... hrCons.pdf

eelofwest wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Just came across the following over at Big Footy posted by Prince Imperial. Very impressive figures indeed for Fox Footy, in particular Brisbane. =D> =D> =D>

Prince Imperial wrote:

Once again Fox Footy is easily the best rating subscription channel for the week 22/4 to 22/8. It secured 3.6% of subscription viewers placing it well ahead of Fox 8 and Fox Sports 2 both at 2.3%.

There are also some interesting figures available for total channel share in each of the 5 city metro markets. The total metropolitan viewing for all TV channels (including those who don't have pay) shows that nationally Fox Footy had 1.6% of all viewing. The city figures were Sydney (0.5), Melbourne (2.6), Brisbane (1.3), Adelaide (1.9) and Perth (2.2) . Very good result for Brisbane I would think especially given the onfield weakness of the Lions and Suns.

http://www.oztam.com.au//documents/2012 ... hrCons.pdf

This would be your contra kicking in with all your tv shows.

Pay Tv
NRL game day ratings vs AFL game day ratings No contest.
NRL games averaging 300+k each per round on FOX compared to AFL averaging about 180k per game every round. =D> Last year AFL averaged 170k per game on Pay Tv, wow what a waste of money Mr Murdoch