Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:57 am
- Team: Cobar Roosters
- Location: The Ord river
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
if this offer is genuine
why hasn't the aflol said yep
lets get this inked .. get this deal done
what are they waiting for
what is there to ponder
oh yea thats right
there is no offer
its just another attempt to create bidding tension & the article says as much
its laughable its that fake
why hasn't the aflol said yep
lets get this inked .. get this deal done
what are they waiting for
what is there to ponder
oh yea thats right
there is no offer
its just another attempt to create bidding tension & the article says as much
its laughable its that fake
- Quolls2019
- Coach
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 1:20 pm
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been liked: 120 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
The article does not say they are broke…their business model is interesting.truthbomber wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 6:32 pmi see soQuolls2019 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 5:48 pmI think their debt is a little bit more…but yes they have offered $3 billion.truthbomber wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 5:30 pmi read somewhere recently paramount are in debt globally to the tune of 16 billion dollars
& fumblers think they're going to fork out 3 billion for their silly little half of one tiny country sport
https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/media/n ... ed-balance
ch 10 are broke
paramount are broke
but .. they're gunna give the awful 3 billion dollars then ?
They are paying their debt payments, and have just paid an extraordinary amount for IPA, upfront apparently.
So….
There are lies, damn lies and then there are ratings.
Rugby league, Australias most popular game in some of North Eastern Australia.
Rugby league, Australias most popular game in some of North Eastern Australia.
- Quolls2019
- Coach
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 1:20 pm
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been liked: 120 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
Because the AFL think they can…and maybe will get more….which is a lot.truthbomber wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 6:47 pmif this offer is genuine
why hasn't the aflol said yep
lets get this inked .. get this deal done
what are they waiting for
what is there to ponder
oh yea thats right
there is no offer
its just another attempt to create bidding tension & the article says as much
its laughable its that fake
There are lies, damn lies and then there are ratings.
Rugby league, Australias most popular game in some of North Eastern Australia.
Rugby league, Australias most popular game in some of North Eastern Australia.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:57 am
- Team: Cobar Roosters
- Location: The Ord river
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
more then 600 mill a yearQuolls2019 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 8:10 pmBecause the AFL think they can…and maybe will get more….which is a lot.truthbomber wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 6:47 pmif this offer is genuine
why hasn't the aflol said yep
lets get this inked .. get this deal done
what are they waiting for
what is there to ponder
oh yea thats right
there is no offer
its just another attempt to create bidding tension & the article says as much
its laughable its that fake
OMFG
fumblers
its not enough they're deluded , they're off their fucking heads
Last edited by truthbomber on Sat Jul 02, 2022 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:57 am
- Team: Cobar Roosters
- Location: The Ord river
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
no one
not paramount ( they're broke )
not ch 10
they're broke too
not ch 9 ..
not foxtel
not ch 7
amazon
disney
not anyone
is paying the derps & misses 600 mill PA , or anything like it
they have the offer from their present partners
& its not great
hence these utter BS stories to try & lever a bit more
it won't work
enjoy fumblers
enjoy
not paramount ( they're broke )
not ch 10
they're broke too
not ch 9 ..
not foxtel
not ch 7
amazon
disney
not anyone
is paying the derps & misses 600 mill PA , or anything like it
they have the offer from their present partners
& its not great
hence these utter BS stories to try & lever a bit more
it won't work
enjoy fumblers
enjoy
- Quolls2019
- Coach
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 1:20 pm
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been liked: 120 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
So you are saying no-one will bid for AFL?truthbomber wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 8:21 pmno one
not paramount ( they're broke )
not ch 10
they're broke too
not ch 9 ..
not foxtel
not ch 7
amazon
disney
not anyone
is paying the derps & misses 600 mill PA , or anything like it
they have the offer from their present partners
& its not great
hence these utter BS stories to try & lever a bit more
it won't work
enjoy fumblers
enjoy
No-one will bid more.
Only the current partners are bidding?
As always you are a bit all over the place except you are totally anti AFL.
So enlighten us, exactly what are you predicting?
There are lies, damn lies and then there are ratings.
Rugby league, Australias most popular game in some of North Eastern Australia.
Rugby league, Australias most popular game in some of North Eastern Australia.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:57 am
- Team: Cobar Roosters
- Location: The Ord river
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
yea no one is bidding is what i saidQuolls2019 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 8:48 pmSo you are saying no-one will bid for AFL?truthbomber wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 8:21 pmno one
not paramount ( they're broke )
not ch 10
they're broke too
not ch 9 ..
not foxtel
not ch 7
amazon
disney
not anyone
is paying the derps & misses 600 mill PA , or anything like it
they have the offer from their present partners
& its not great
hence these utter BS stories to try & lever a bit more
it won't work
enjoy fumblers
enjoy
No-one will bid more.
Only the current partners are bidding?
As always you are a bit all over the place except you are totally anti AFL.
So enlighten us, exactly what are you predicting?
I said you thick as shit clown
no one is offering 600 mill PA
ive had my say at what I think will occur
a rise akin to inflation 5% , around 20 mill more pa
nothing more, there is no justification for more
no more content , getting whopped by the NRL
Ch7 & foxtel have made their offers already I'd say & this is what they've offered
the aflol want more
they won't get it
no other genuine bidders exist
end of
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 232 times
- Been liked: 51 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
I really hope the massive Channel 10/Paramount+ bid gets up. I’m tired of Channel 7’s coverage of the game and Ten did a good job last time they had the rights.
Big payday for sure, whoever wins the rights, with even News Corp’s The Australian reporting the $3b bid from Channel 10/Paramount+.
Big payday for sure, whoever wins the rights, with even News Corp’s The Australian reporting the $3b bid from Channel 10/Paramount+.
Report: 10 bids $3b for AFL rights
10 reportedly wants all the rights, including digital rights, some matches on 10 and the remainder on Paramount+.
Published by David Knox
on July 2, 2022
10 has bid a record $3b for AFL rights according to a media report.
The Australian reports 10 is understood to have told AFL executives it would be keen to have all the rights, including digital rights, telecasting some matches on its main free-to-air channel and the remainder on Paramount+ streaming.
Incumbents Foxtel and Seven are still considered favourites to maintain their package of rights, but the AFL hopes the 10 offer, which sources say is worth $600m annually over at least five years, will ignite a bidding war.
Foxtel and Seven had previously clinched a record $2.508bn deal with the AFL for six years from 2017, though the terms for Covid-affected years were later reduced when the pandemic hit.
The AFL hopes to secure a deal by the end of July or early August.
10 and an AFL declined to comment.
https://tvtonight.com.au/2022/07/report ... ights.html
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9317
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:13 am
- Team: Collingwood
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been liked: 156 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
Would be funny watching the meltdown from some hereof it does go through -
I would hate it to go to paramount streaming. Would get rid of fox that’s for sure.
I would hate it to go to paramount streaming. Would get rid of fox that’s for sure.
Veni, vidi, vici
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 232 times
- Been liked: 51 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
Yeah true haha
Just imagine the meltdown from all all the V’Landys the Great lovers.
What’s the issue with Paramount streaming? I don’t have it, but have heard there are issues with their soccer coverage. Is that what you mean? Surely any issues would be addressed for a major code like the AFL.
Like you, I’d be dumping Fox/Kayo in an instant with no AFL, as I don’t watch anything else on there. Would dump Telstra as my telco too as I only stay with them for the AFL/Kayo deal.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:57 am
- Team: Cobar Roosters
- Location: The Ord river
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
Beaussie wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 5:50 amI really hope the massive Channel 10/Paramount+ bid gets up. I’m tired of Channel 7’s coverage of the game and Ten did a good job last time they had the rights.
Big payday for sure, whoever wins the rights, with even News Corp’s The Australian reporting the $3b bid from Channel 10/Paramount+.
Report: 10 bids $3b for AFL rights
10 reportedly wants all the rights, including digital rights, some matches on 10 and the remainder on Paramount+.
Published by David Knox
on July 2, 2022
10 has bid a record $3b for AFL rights according to a media report.
The Australian reports 10 is understood to have told AFL executives it would be keen to have all the rights, including digital rights, telecasting some matches on its main free-to-air channel and the remainder on Paramount+ streaming.
Incumbents Foxtel and Seven are still considered favourites to maintain their package of rights, but the AFL hopes the 10 offer, which sources say is worth $600m annually over at least five years, will ignite a bidding war.
Foxtel and Seven had previously clinched a record $2.508bn deal with the AFL for six years from 2017, though the terms for Covid-affected years were later reduced when the pandemic hit.
The AFL hopes to secure a deal by the end of July or early August.
10 and an AFL declined to comment.
https://tvtonight.com.au/2022/07/report ... ights.html
why are you fumblers so fucking dumb
this bit here indicates its a fantasy offer & doesn't exist & the reason theres been no official comment from Ch 10 paramount
Incumbents Foxtel and Seven are still considered favourites to maintain their package of rights, but the AFL hopes the 10 offer, which sources say is worth $600m annually over at least five years, will ignite a bidding war.
right there.. thats the kicker ..
its just a Saturday morning wank story & there is no substance to it,
on what planet would anyone offer 600 mill for 9 games a week for a sport performing as poorly as the aflol , that rates like a turd in half of the country , that can't get within cooee for eyeballs against another sport in the same market , that is on approx 400 mill pa for 8 games a week.
this hilarious attempt to lever more out of foxtel & 7
( im certain they've tendered their offers & its not a great deal more then the present amounts paid )
is great entertainment & the fumblers lapping it up is every better entertainment
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:57 am
- Team: Cobar Roosters
- Location: The Ord river
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
i somehow don't think it'll be the fumblers laughing fweddy
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 232 times
- Been liked: 51 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
truthbomber wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 8:55 amBeaussie wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 5:50 amI really hope the massive Channel 10/Paramount+ bid gets up. I’m tired of Channel 7’s coverage of the game and Ten did a good job last time they had the rights.
Big payday for sure, whoever wins the rights, with even News Corp’s The Australian reporting the $3b bid from Channel 10/Paramount+.
Report: 10 bids $3b for AFL rights
10 reportedly wants all the rights, including digital rights, some matches on 10 and the remainder on Paramount+.
Published by David Knox
on July 2, 2022
10 has bid a record $3b for AFL rights according to a media report.
The Australian reports 10 is understood to have told AFL executives it would be keen to have all the rights, including digital rights, telecasting some matches on its main free-to-air channel and the remainder on Paramount+ streaming.
Incumbents Foxtel and Seven are still considered favourites to maintain their package of rights, but the AFL hopes the 10 offer, which sources say is worth $600m annually over at least five years, will ignite a bidding war.
Foxtel and Seven had previously clinched a record $2.508bn deal with the AFL for six years from 2017, though the terms for Covid-affected years were later reduced when the pandemic hit.
The AFL hopes to secure a deal by the end of July or early August.
10 and an AFL declined to comment.
https://tvtonight.com.au/2022/07/report ... ights.html
why are you fumblers so fucking dumb
this bit here indicates its a fantasy offer & doesn't exist & the reason theres been no official comment from Ch 10 paramount
Incumbents Foxtel and Seven are still considered favourites to maintain their package of rights, but the AFL hopes the 10 offer, which sources say is worth $600m annually over at least five years, will ignite a bidding war.
right there.. thats the kicker ..
its just a Saturday morning wank story & there is no substance to it,
on what planet would anyone offer 600 mill for 9 games a week for a sport performing as poorly as the aflol , that rates like a turd in half of the country , that can't get within cooee for eyeballs against another sport in the same market , that is on approx 400 mill pa for 8 games a week.
this hilarious attempt to lever more out of foxtel & 7
( im certain they've tendered their offers & its not a great deal more then the present amounts paid )
is great entertainment & the fumblers lapping it up is every better entertainment
News Corp’s The Australian would say that wouldn’t they. Gees you will look silly when the AFL announces their latest record breaking broadcast rights deal.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:57 am
- Team: Cobar Roosters
- Location: The Ord river
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
why wouldn't they idiot ?Beaussie wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 10:59 amtruthbomber wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 8:55 amBeaussie wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 5:50 amI really hope the massive Channel 10/Paramount+ bid gets up. I’m tired of Channel 7’s coverage of the game and Ten did a good job last time they had the rights.
Big payday for sure, whoever wins the rights, with even News Corp’s The Australian reporting the $3b bid from Channel 10/Paramount+.
why are you fumblers so fucking dumb
this bit here indicates its a fantasy offer & doesn't exist & the reason theres been no official comment from Ch 10 paramount
Incumbents Foxtel and Seven are still considered favourites to maintain their package of rights, but the AFL hopes the 10 offer, which sources say is worth $600m annually over at least five years, will ignite a bidding war.
right there.. thats the kicker ..
its just a Saturday morning wank story & there is no substance to it,
on what planet would anyone offer 600 mill for 9 games a week for a sport performing as poorly as the aflol , that rates like a turd in half of the country , that can't get within cooee for eyeballs against another sport in the same market , that is on approx 400 mill pa for 8 games a week.
this hilarious attempt to lever more out of foxtel & 7
( im certain they've tendered their offers & its not a great deal more then the present amounts paid )
is great entertainment & the fumblers lapping it up is every better entertainment
News Corp’s The Australian would say that wouldn’t they. Gees you will look silly when the AFL announces their latest record breaking broadcast rights deal.
the jurno who wrote the story is a well known aflol lacky .... do some research you bubble dwelling ****
& not half as silly as you when the deal announced is not much bigger then the current oneGees you will look silly when the AFL announces their latest record breaking broadcast rights deal.
holy schamoly you & your derping mates would wanna be somewhere else
-
- Captain
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2020 8:00 pm
- Team: Easts
- Location: geelong
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been liked: 36 times
Re: Streaming companies want to broadcast AFL
I'snt the idea to make money from these rights?
why would anyone want to stream the AFL?
I wonder if these fantasy/perspective buyers realize just what there letting themselves in for.
why would anyone want to stream the AFL?
I wonder if these fantasy/perspective buyers realize just what there letting themselves in for.
Australia's number 1 sport RUGBY LEAGUE. Preferred by more Australians than any other
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests