Talking Footy

Another week and another big Friday night win for the AFL over the NRL.

Friday

SEVEN’S AFL: FRIDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL – PRE MATCH Channel 7 364,000 14,000 205,000 12,000 94,000 39,000

SEVEN’S AFL: FRIDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL Channel 7 565,000 16,000 280,000 17,000 179,000 74,000





Saturday







SEVEN’S AFL: SATURDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL 7mate 247,000 33,000 104,000 18,000 20,000 72,000

Some really great numbers there Beau and don't forget the 247k watching on FTA Last night and the billions of Chinamen who will wake up this morning with a smile on there face, all thanks to the AFL

Lol @ STV figures .
They've gone down quicker than a $2 hooker

As I predicted the AFL Fox ratings have continued to tank. R9 2017 1618k, R9 2018 1402. Yep that's 216k less viewers this week for Fox alone.

The NRL on the other hand once again beat last years number, albeit by only 33k, but an increase nonetheless. And it must be noted I am not including NZ Warriors ratings.

Terry wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 11:10 am

As I predicted the AFL Fox ratings have continued to tank. R9 2017 1618k, R9 2018 1402. Yep that's 216k less viewers this week for Fox alone.

The NRL on the other hand once again beat last years number, albeit by only 33k, but an increase nonetheless. And it must be noted I am not including NZ Warriors ratings.

We are smashing them without the home ratings of one of our teams .

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 12:07 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 11:10 am

As I predicted the AFL Fox ratings have continued to tank. R9 2017 1618k, R9 2018 1402. Yep that's 216k less viewers this week for Fox alone.

The NRL on the other hand once again beat last years number, albeit by only 33k, but an increase nonetheless. And it must be noted I am not including NZ Warriors ratings.

We are smashing them without the home ratings of one of our teams .

if you allow for 7 of our games being shown concurrently, and our 50% longer telecast, it is us who is smashing you

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 12:55 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 12:07 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 11:10 am

As I predicted the AFL Fox ratings have continued to tank. R9 2017 1618k, R9 2018 1402. Yep that's 216k less viewers this week for Fox alone.

The NRL on the other hand once again beat last years number, albeit by only 33k, but an increase nonetheless. And it must be noted I am not including NZ Warriors ratings.

We are smashing them without the home ratings of one of our teams .

if you allow for 7 of our games being shown concurrently, and our 50% longer telecast, it is us who is smashing you

Smashed again this week but but but but

How is it Overlap such a big thing LOL if only about 30% of people have pay TV.

The game yesterday, a game of some interest to AFL fans. Almost total overlap but still managed 270k.

The teams on the banned list have next to no interest. But they all have to play sometimes.

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:09 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 12:55 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 12:07 pm

We are smashing them without the home ratings of one of our teams .

if you allow for 7 of our games being shown concurrently, and our 50% longer telecast, it is us who is smashing you

Smashed again this week but but but but

How is it Overlap such a big thing LOL if only about 30% of people have pay TV.

The game yesterday, a game of some interest to AFL fans. Almost total overlap but still managed 270k.

The teams on the banned list have next to no interest. But they all have to play sometimes.

hmm, I dunno, cause 30% of your audience can only choose 1 game?

Yes we have some expansion teams with very small support, but these are additional teams that you dont even have. If you had 2 teams in perth and 2 in Melbourne you'd have some poor ratings too. Our top 15 clubs are easily as strong as yours

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:38 pm

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:09 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 12:55 pm

if you allow for 7 of our games being shown concurrently, and our 50% longer telecast, it is us who is smashing you

Smashed again this week but but but but

How is it Overlap such a big thing LOL if only about 30% of people have pay TV.

The game yesterday, a game of some interest to AFL fans. Almost total overlap but still managed 270k.

The teams on the banned list have next to no interest. But they all have to play sometimes.

hmm, I dunno, cause 30% of your audience can only choose 1 game?

Yes we have some expansion teams with very small support, but these are additional teams that you dont even have. If you had 2 teams in perth and 2 in Melbourne you'd have some poor ratings too. Our top 15 clubs are easily as strong as yours

Pal, you don't seem to know what you're talking about!! Our fox ratings are for 15.5 teams v 18 & we still flog you. If we had more teams we would beat you by more ya dill!!!! Shhhheeessshhhhhh......this is becoming embarrassing!!!!!!!!

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:38 pm

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:09 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 12:55 pm

if you allow for 7 of our games being shown concurrently, and our 50% longer telecast, it is us who is smashing you

Smashed again this week but but but but

How is it Overlap such a big thing LOL if only about 30% of people have pay TV.

The game yesterday, a game of some interest to AFL fans. Almost total overlap but still managed 270k.

The teams on the banned list have next to no interest. But they all have to play sometimes.

hmm, I dunno, cause 30% of your audience can only choose 1 game?

Yes we have some expansion teams with very small support, but these are additional teams that you dont even have. If you had 2 teams in perth and 2 in Melbourne you'd have some poor ratings too. Our top 15 clubs are easily as strong as yours

you always seem to forget the FTA side of things>>
yes there is overlap> but all games are on FTA in at least 1 to 2 states at one time
with every single game.

Sorry, I said earlier we won the ratings , They actually smashed us in the ratings. I forgot to multiply there's by 1.5

leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 4:18 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:38 pm

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:09 pm

Smashed again this week but but but but

How is it Overlap such a big thing LOL if only about 30% of people have pay TV.

The game yesterday, a game of some interest to AFL fans. Almost total overlap but still managed 270k.

The teams on the banned list have next to no interest. But they all have to play sometimes.

hmm, I dunno, cause 30% of your audience can only choose 1 game?

Yes we have some expansion teams with very small support, but these are additional teams that you dont even have. If you had 2 teams in perth and 2 in Melbourne you'd have some poor ratings too. Our top 15 clubs are easily as strong as yours

you always seem to forget the FTA side of things>>
yes there is overlap> but all games are on FTA in at least 1 to 2 states at one time
with every single game.

Im not the one ignoring FTA, these guys were talking about foxtel ratings

Yes, almost every game is on FTA to at least one market. However, the total FTA games for each state is still between 3 and 4

Terry wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 3:48 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:38 pm

pussycat wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:09 pm

Smashed again this week but but but but

How is it Overlap such a big thing LOL if only about 30% of people have pay TV.

The game yesterday, a game of some interest to AFL fans. Almost total overlap but still managed 270k.

The teams on the banned list have next to no interest. But they all have to play sometimes.

hmm, I dunno, cause 30% of your audience can only choose 1 game?

Yes we have some expansion teams with very small support, but these are additional teams that you dont even have. If you had 2 teams in perth and 2 in Melbourne you'd have some poor ratings too. Our top 15 clubs are easily as strong as yours

Pal, you don't seem to know what you're talking about!! Our fox ratings are for 15.5 teams v 18 & we still flog you. If we had more teams we would beat you by more ya dill!!!! Shhhheeessshhhhhh......this is becoming embarrassing!!!!!!!!

8 games played in isolation to 1. A short 2 hour telecast to 3. 16 hours on TV to 27.

These are factors you continually ignore. I wonder why

Fact is if the AFL get a similar sized audience for a 50% longer program the AFL is clearly more watched

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 6:00 pm

Terry wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 3:48 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Mon May 21, 2018 2:38 pm

hmm, I dunno, cause 30% of your audience can only choose 1 game?

Yes we have some expansion teams with very small support, but these are additional teams that you dont even have. If you had 2 teams in perth and 2 in Melbourne you'd have some poor ratings too. Our top 15 clubs are easily as strong as yours

Pal, you don't seem to know what you're talking about!! Our fox ratings are for 15.5 teams v 18 & we still flog you. If we had more teams we would beat you by more ya dill!!!! Shhhheeessshhhhhh......this is becoming embarrassing!!!!!!!!

8 games played in isolation to 1. A short 2 hour telecast to 3. 16 hours on TV to 27.

These are factors you continually ignore. I wonder why

Fact is if the AFL get a similar sized audience for a 50% longer program the AFL is clearly more watched

I will agree with you to a certain degree>>

yes longer telecast for a period of time of 3hrs to a 2hrs would mean more people are watching to a "degree".
this is taken into account by broadcasters. that is why AFL got that bit more>
because it = more advertising blocks for a longer period.

Simply put for the brain dead simpletons
When the AFL GF V NRL GF ratings are compared ..it's the highest rating game

Nowhere is there any mention of 1.5 x the AFL ratings ..nowhere but in the brainwashed mind of our resident cultist.
Feel free to show where any tv station ...media or ratings company use this formula

When you find that get back to me
Until then
You're a fucking nutjob .