Is rugby just mma?

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
User avatar
SportCapital
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1035
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:08 pm
Team: Melbourne Storm-Essendon Bombers-Melbourne Victory
Location: The Sport Capital
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 76 times

Re: Is rugby just mma?

Post by SportCapital »

AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:18 am
Lol I'll,explain it in simple terms .you still will have massive troubles .
For every 100 people at a fumble game approx 41 are female
For every 100 people at an NRL game approx 37.5 are female .

Now according to you 41 is close to 50

Yet 37.5 doesn't come close to 41.

In vicderpian education ....3.5 or 4 is far bigger than 9

Put your helmet back on next time you ride a bike .
Although I suspect the damage has already been done .
You are next level stupid!
You really struggle with percentages.
41.38 is close.
37.5 is not close.
So my statement is accurate relative to 50/50
37.5 is not close to 41.38 because it requires a 10.35% increase.
Greater than 10% is not close.
So my statement is also accurate relative to the percentages of women at our games.
I don't think I can dumb it down anymore than that.
Please take some time to comprehend the equations.
Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 4567
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has thanked: 5 times
Been liked: 163 times

Re: Is rugby just mma?

Post by Terry »

SportCapital wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:46 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:18 am
Lol I'll,explain it in simple terms .you still will have massive troubles .
For every 100 people at a fumble game approx 41 are female
For every 100 people at an NRL game approx 37.5 are female .

Now according to you 41 is close to 50

Yet 37.5 doesn't come close to 41.

In vicderpian education ....3.5 or 4 is far bigger than 9

Put your helmet back on next time you ride a bike .
Although I suspect the damage has already been done .
You are next level stupid!
You really struggle with percentages.
41.38 is close.
37.5 is not close.
So my statement is accurate relative to 50/50
37.5 is not close to 41.38 because it requires a 10.35% increase.
Greater than 10% is not close.
So my statement is also accurate relative to the percentages of women at our games.
I don't think I can dumb it down anymore than that.
Please take some time to comprehend the equations.
Wow impressive stuff!!!! Did you previously work for Kim Jong Il in the progaganda department???? Hilarious!!!! No wonder everyone outside the bubble laughs at any figures put out by your dear leader at fumblehouse lololololololololololol.

By the way: Did anyone ever find those 'thousands' of locals hiding under the stands at last years game in China???????
Lolololoololololololololol.
User avatar
SportCapital
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1035
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:08 pm
Team: Melbourne Storm-Essendon Bombers-Melbourne Victory
Location: The Sport Capital
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 76 times

Re: Is rugby just mma?

Post by SportCapital »

See crap, even Terry can appreciate the logic.
And he's not easily impressed.
AFLcrap1
Coach
Coach
Posts: 18930
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
Team: The Scottish Puffins
Location:
Has thanked: 107 times
Been liked: 75 times

Re: Is rugby just mma?

Post by AFLcrap1 »

SportCapital wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:46 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:18 am
Lol I'll,explain it in simple terms .you still will have massive troubles .
For every 100 people at a fumble game approx 41 are female
For every 100 people at an NRL game approx 37.5 are female .

Now according to you 41 is close to 50

Yet 37.5 doesn't come close to 41.

In vicderpian education ....3.5 or 4 is far bigger than 9

Put your helmet back on next time you ride a bike .
Although I suspect the damage has already been done .
You are next level stupid!
You really struggle with percentages.
41.38 is close.
37.5 is not close.
So my statement is accurate relative to 50/50
37.5 is not close to 41.38 because it requires a 10.35% increase.
Greater than 10% is not close.
So my statement is also accurate relative to the percentages of women at our games.
I don't think I can dumb it down anymore than that.
Please take some time to comprehend the equations.
Oh dear .
I simplified it for you & you still can't see it .
Oh well I tried l
You get 1 point for being unco & missing

But heres a little brain teaser for you .using your logic .
My bet is you still won't get it .
What percentage increase does the afl need to get to 50/50
Much larger than 10
Let's say about 20%
SO now using your fucked up logic 10% is more than 20%.

I think it's time for the medics
TLPG 🤣liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP

and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
🤣
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
:^o :^o
Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 4567
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has thanked: 5 times
Been liked: 163 times

Re: Is rugby just mma?

Post by Terry »

There is no point conversing with these dills. Case in point: Sportcrapital believes 41 is close to 50 but 37 is not close to 41????? Lololololololololololololoolol. His remedial maths teacher deadest failed with this dullard!!

These fumblers are so delusional they are beyond help.

Yep. Medic?????? Medic????
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 22 guests