Return of the Fudge?

[AFLcrap1]

Um read the article dickhead .
They said they were confident the numbers released for crowds were right.
So where is the follow up on this claim .
Nothing at all
Not one person or organisation has put forward any evidence at all that it is true

News LTD
They throw some mud
It sticks

A successful tactic
A lot like the afl propaganda machine


When you can find something to show that the numbers were fudged please get back to me

6C92D4D7-29C6-4B42-AA9F-171F6B35685F.jpeg
Fudge fudge fudge

Can you please attach a name to whoever released these figure
Which official,from which organisation ..was it a GOVT sporting official?

Maybe a stadium boss ?

Lol tumbleweeds blowing

Oh wait you can't
Lol
As usual .

[Fred]

So an article is produced .... and it’s not good enough ? You asked for proof and are provided then you give the “oh yeah but but “. .

[Fred]

Leaked crowd figures obtained by The Courier-Mail reveal a 15 per cent inflation on the NRL’s reported crowd attendance for Sydney games compared to actual crowd figures during this year’s finals series.


Now the but but ... who leaked ... nrl said it didn’t fudge ....

[Terry]

Leaked crowd figures obtained by The Courier-Mail reveal a 15 per cent inflation on the NRL’s reported crowd attendance for Sydney games compared to actual crowd figures during this year’s finals series.


Now the but but ... who leaked ... nrl said it didn’t fudge ....

Fred, please refer to the other thread where I cleared this up. Also refer to the many other posts I have made referring to this matter. Also refer to your doctor for your chronic memory loss.

[Fred]

And not once do you address the issue again.

[Terry]

And not once do you address the issue again.

AGAIN ?????????? How many times do I have to tell you the same thing for gods sake.

shutterstock_81158878.jpg (45.34 KiB) Viewed 1066 times

Into the bowl you go with Lic for a few more laps Lolololololoolololololol.

[AFLcrap1]

So an article is produced .... and it’s not good enough ? You asked for proof and are provided then you give the “oh yeah but but “. .

Are you on planet Earth
No source
No govt sports official
No stadium official
Just some vague reference .

When there is proof please post it
Until then
This is bullshit

& do your homework on News ltd & RL in this country
You might have a clue

[AFLcrap1]

Fred
Time for an Education .
You will probably ignore as it will destroy your argument & highlight how News Ltd journos write utter unsubstantiated shit .
I had to dig to find it but there was even a thread on BF about it .
How they print stuff with no talking to anyone involved
How they print bullshit without checking facts .
They even printed a story ...made up by a RL fan( to prove how they post anything unsubstantiated ) about how Swans Players assaulted someone on a train in Syd
Printed yep
It was that RL hating cow Wilson .
Now she's gone Kent & Slothfield have continued the bullshit .
Read how she claimed she was banned from the Bulldogs
Then read Malcolm Noads reply
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/ ... ad.167516/

It should open your eyes to how news ltd work .
But I won't hold my breath .

[Fred]

I think you’re paranoid. You were given proof. You don’t accept it. But here’s the thing ... you’re quick to jump on an anti afl article in the paper.

I think lic has provided proof but you don’t like it as it doesn’t suit your arguement

[AFLcrap1]

Well how surprising
You ignored my post


& I was not given proof
I have just posted where News LTd print unsubstantiated bullshit
Yet you ignore that .
Yep
No surprises .

It wrecks your argument so you ignore .

[Fred]

You expect me to read it ??? Really lol. I don’t even think I read the entirety of your post lol

[AFLcrap1]

So that's a no
Lol gave up meekly didn't you

Yet you believe a negative rL story by this mob
But won't read where they have been caught out bullshitting .
Lol says it all
Put a fork in Fred ..he's done

[Fred]

No... I believe there were leaked figures. You don’t (no surprise there) .

[AFLcrap1]

Still won't read where they print articles with no facts ..nothing .
Lol you won't go there will you
I know why .


They printed a story on an assault because someone emailed the story to them .
No checking nothing .
Just printed it .

So yeh any article they print is suspect till ptproven .
& that's going on past form .

You seem to think they're the bastion of truth & integrity

[Fred]

Hmmmm ....