Buzz wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:57 pm
King-Eliagh wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:27 pm
Buzz! What's happened dude?? Ur 'yes vote' don't allow democracy to debate and now alls you got is "you got nothing"...??? The true calling card of a debate loser. Where's ur 'debate' gone buddy?
What's about answering the question - can your poor lil kids actually be taught to be gay? You argue you gotta protect em right?
He's deadest done!!!
...how many times do i have to tell you: it's called 'grooming'!
If you want to pretend for the 10 000th time that you don't know what that is then that's your fault!
You're just some spasticated feminist who refuses to listen to what people actually say.
Bro....bro bro .. Bro bro
Lemme break it down like James brown for you bro
First you said the yes vote will provide opportunity for schools to teach ur kids to be gay. You also said you gotta protect ur kids from this.
I asked "can schools teach your kids, or anyone to be gay??"
You switched stance to ur weak side and said "it's called grooming KE"
Ok u struggled in ur first stance so let's switch terms and meanings bro, I totally know what grooming means
So Answer me this - do you really believe schools can groom kids to be gay??? If so please enlighten us with your professed enlightenment and describe how schools/teachers might be able to groom ur poor vulnerable kids how to be gay.... That is if the poor sods aren't already gay I mean